About this page
This page examines the life, writings, and depictions of the Malays by Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), situating his portrayals within their historical, political, and intellectual context.
Biography of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826)
This section provides a concise overview of the life of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), highlighting the experiences and historical circumstances that shaped his worldview and writings on the Malays.
Historical Background
This section provides a concise overview of the life of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), highlighting the experiences and historical circumstances that shaped his worldview and writings on the Malays.
During the time of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), England was in the period of the Georgian Era (1714–1830) and the Romantic Movement (1798–1837), Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) lived under the reign of King George III (r. 1760–1820) who had suffered from mental illness and King George IV (r. 1820–1830) who was known as “the first gentleman of England” by the British people; while experiencing revolutions and involved in wars; the American Revolution (1775–1783), the French Revolution (1789–1799), the Industrial Revolutions (1760–1840), and the Napolean Wars (1803–1815).
This has caused severe financial strain to the Raffles’ family where he had to stop his schooling and was employed by the British East India Company in England (EIC), a few years later, he was transferred to the East.
In the Malay Archipelago, the life of the commonfolk Malays was generally untouched by EIC as the head of the political institutions were the Malay Sultan. The Malay economy composed of agrarian and maritime trades. While the Malay culture was strong, the political figure head faced increasing pressure and oppression from external forces.
Stamford Raffles direct relationship with the Malay people is that he mostly governed the Malays.
During the period of pregnancy and birth of Stamford Raffles (1780 -1781), England was engaged with war with France, Spain and the Netherlands, and the American War of Independence.
This affected Captain Benjamin Raffles, were he suffered financially, consequently his wife and children too and they lived in debt.
Even reading became a luxury in the household, signified when Stamford Raffles’ mother said to him, “Tom, aren’t you in bed yet? It’s very late. You’re wasting money burning so many candles, and you know we can’t afford it.”
The worldview of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) is of the belief of Graeco-Roman Worldview in the Georgian Era (1714–1830) and the Anglican Church along with the reason of logico-positivism simultaneously a fatalist.
He had a gentle temperament towards the Malays in the Malay Peninsula, yet he was not kind to the people of Sumatera and the Javanese.
He studied and preserved Malay knowledge and some elements of Malay civilization, and protected Malacca physically and through epistolary affairs with EIC, pleading his employers not to destroy Malacca, and physically travelled to Malacca to save the place from bombing nad other destructions.
On the other hand, he destroyed the Javanese Kratons and massacred other people in Sumatera.
Contributions
These are the contributions made by Stamford Raffles
The most prominent official contribution of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) is the founding of modern Singapore (1819).
By the 30th January 1819, a five-preliminary agreement had been signed with the Temenggong Abdul Rahman allowing the British to establish a factory on the island of Singapore.
According to Captain J.G.F. Crawford, one day after this treaty had been concluded, the Union Jack was unceremoniously hoisted on the shore.
Singapore belonged to the Malay State of Johore. In 1958, Malaya had achieved Independence from the British. However, Sabah and Sarawak joined the new Sovereign nation of Malaya and Singapore was separated from Malaya and this resulted to the creation of Malaysia in 1963. Malaysia Day is 16 September 1963.
The one with the power to cut ties with Singapore was Tunku Abdul Rahman, the first Prime Minister of Malaya and Malaysia who was also a prince of the Malay State of Kedah. The 3 main people who pressured for Separation was Goh Keng Swee, Lee Kwan Yu, and Tan Siew Sin (a MCA politician). The once Malay island of Pulau Temasik and Singapura is now Singapore.
Stamford Raffles saved Malacca in 1808 from destruction at the hands of the East India Company.
The Penang Presidency wanted to destroy Malacca for Penang to flourish, however,
Stamford Raffles argued that “trade cannot be forced” that “trade is to be free if it is free to flourish. Associations, native customs, historic memories — all act as magnets for trade. You may drive trade out of Malacca, but it doesn’t follow that it will go to Penang.”
Raffles wrote to Lord Minto, the Chief of Bengal Government, “where the policy was altered and the destruction was never carried out.”
Transfer of the Bendahara Dynaty of Sultan Hussein Shah to the Temenggung Dynasty.
Stamford Raffles established the Singapore Institute in 1823.
After tendering his resignation in 1823, Stamford Raffles stayed in Singapore for nine months to establish the Singapore Institute, outlawed gambling, with heavy taxation upon drunkenness and opium-smoking and banned slavery.
Stamford Raffles collected and preserved Malay Manuscripts.
Stamford Raffles introduced the concept of race in the Malay world.
He studied the Malays and preserved Malay knowledge which seeded Western Malay Studies.
This was a foreign concept as the Malay terminology is “orang” or “people.”
Stamford Raffles tried to abolish slavery in the Malay Archipelago, and was punished for it when he died and was denied a Christian burial by the St. Mary’s Church of Hendon.
The location of his body was unknown until 1914 where it was discovered to be in a vault. He was then, he was finally laid to rest at the St. Mary’s Church Hendon, England.
Stamford Raffles co-founded the London Zoo upon retirement and returning to England.
The British factory in Singapore had brought waves of Chinese migration to Singapore whom intended to work for a period of time and return to China. However, plenty decided to stay and formed Chinese permanent immigration on the island.
Legacy
The following are amongst the legacies left by Stamford Raffles.
The significance of the Malay colonial identity in the writings of Stamford Raffles in Western Malay Studies is his mastery of the Malay Language and the direct communications he had with Malays of Royalty, nobility, commoners, and the enslaved for an extensive period and intense measure.
He knew them intimately as he lived amongst them, befriended them, governed them, while he did some double-dealing to play off two rival factions from the declining Sultanate of Riau and Johore.
Raffles began his study of the Malay language on his voyage to Penang.
Prior to this, Lord Minto took into account the reason of Warren Hasting’s impeachment where he came to the realisation of the vitality of the proper government of foreign races depended on the ability of the governors to understand and speak the language of the governed.
Stamford Raffles sought and encouraged the colonial officials to have good relations with the Malays of the Malay Peninsula.
“When Raffles left, after only two years’ residence in Singapore, he enjoined on his successors the need to cultivate the friendship of the Rulers of the Malay States; but no one connected with our possessions in the Straits appears to have remembered Raffles’ advice, or shown any real interest in the Malays of the Peninsula. …Sir Harry Ord was an exception…” Frank Swettenham. Footprints in Malaya. P. 26.
Stamford Raffles is studied and the corpus of literature pertaining him is huge.
Stamford Raffles is one of the person attributed to the scholarship of Western Malay Studies in the English language.
Birth & Death
Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles (1781–1826) was born to Captain Benjamin Raffles (1739–1811) and Anne (nee Lyde) Raffles (1755–1824) on the 6th July 1781. He was birthed on the Anne (ship) while she was enroute from Port Morant, Africa to England.
During the period of pregnancy and birth of Stamford Raffles, England was engaged with war with France, Spain and the Netherlands, and the American War of independence.
Anne is a ship that was built in Scotland, which changed ownership from Hibberts & Co. of Glasgow to Moran in 1782, at Port Morant, Jamaica on the 6th July 1781
The ongoing wars affected Captain Benjamin Raffles, were he suffered financially, consequently his wife and children too and they lived in debt.
The second Lady Raffles found Raffles lying dead in the early morning at the foot of the spiral staircase of their home in Hendon, north London on 5 July 1826.
He died due to a stroke caused by a brain tumour without any continuation to his family.
He was prohibited to be buried in the St. Mary’s Church of Hendon due to his anti-slavery stance. His body’s location was unknown until in 1914, it was discovered to be in a vault. Then, he was finally laid to rest at the St. Mary’s Church Hendon, England.
Family of Origin
His nucleus family consisted of 10 people, 2 parents and 8 children with Stamford Raffles being one of them.
Captain Benjamin Raffles (1739–1811) is the father to Stamford Raffles.
Anne (nee Lyde) Raffles (1755–1824) is the mother to Stamford Raffles.
Anne is the first child of the couple and she died before Stamford Raffles was born.
He was officially christened as Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles, whom was named after his godfathers, Mr. Stamford and Mr. Bingley, though Stamford Raffles denied Mr. Bingley to be his godfather.
On the 4th July 1784. Stamford Raffles’ younger sister, Harriet, (1783) was christened in the same ceremony held at Eaton Bishop Church in Herefordshire, conducted by Rev. John Lindeman on 4th July 1784, along with this younger sister Henrietta (born 1783).
Henrietta is the younger sister of Stamford Raffles and they were Christened at Eaton Bishop Church in Herefordshire by Rev. John Lindeman together on the 4th July 1784.
He was officially christened as Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles, whom was named after his godfathers, Mr. Stamford and Mr. Bingley, though Stamford Raffles denied Mr. Bingley to be his godfather. on the 4th July 1784.
He was officially christened as Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles, whom was named after his godfathers, Stamford Raffles denied Mr. Bingley to be his godfather. on the 4th July 1784.
Schooling
This is the formal education received by Stamford Raffles.
In 1793, Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) entered Mansion House Boarding School, Hammersmith, West London. He was kept by Dr. Anderton. But was taken out after two years after lack of funding for his education; yet this never stopped his zeal for knowledge illustrated throughout his career.
This thirst for knowledge is attested by his constant lament of “The deficiency of my early education has never been fully supplied.”
In his adulthood, William Marden is an intellectual teacher to Stamford Raffles.
Career Portfolio
Stamford Raffles began his career much earlier due to the circumstances of his family. He had only one employer, the British East India Company (EIC).
The East India Company was developed when a group of London-based merchants pooled their capital in 1599 and formed a company to tap into the potential wealth founded on the spices in the Eastern Isles. The East India Company was first known as the “Governor and Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East-Indies,” incorporated on 31 December 1600 and granted a royal charter by Queen Elizabeth 1.
In 1698, the English Trading Company and the Company merged and became the United Company of Merchants Trading to the East Indies, which was also known as the Honourable East India Company and also as John Company. By the end of the eighteenth century, the East India Company emerged as the sole survivor of the private international trading companies formed early in the seventeenth century to trade in the East Indies.
The British parliament’s Government of India Act of 1833 abolished East India Company’s trade monopoly with China as of 22 April 1834. In 1834, the commercial operations were brought to an end and on 2 August 1858 the company had its final abolition with the passing of the Government of India Act.
Stamford Raffles was in Leadenhall Street as a temporary clerk in the secretary’s office through the influence of his uncle Mr. Hamond. His appointment in the East India Company was confirmed in 1800 and in 1802, Raffles was earning GBP 70 a year.
On 8 March 1805 Stamford Raffles was gazetted as Assistant Secretary to the new Governor of Penang the Hon. Philip Dundas. This was his first encounter with Malay Muslims.
Prior to this, he had arrived in Penang in 1805, made time to study the Malay Language and do extra work.
Governor Dundas and his then secretary, Pearson, had frictions, consequently, this led to the appointment of Stamford Raffles by governor Dundas to be his secretary on the 29th August 1806.
Stamford Raffles was appointed as assistant secretary to Council William Clubley on the 22nd March 1807.
At the end of July 1808, Stamford Raffles went to Malacca to physically save Malacca from the destruction of EIC and returned to Penang on 29th October 1808.
In October 1810, Stamford Raffles was appointed as Agent to the Governor-General of the Malay States by Lord Minto, the Governor-General of India (1807– 1813), and then moved to Melaka to plan the invasion of Java.
The successful capture led to Stamford Raffles being appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Java (1811–1816) until Java was handed to the Dutch.
The successful capture led to Stamford Raffles being appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Java (1811–1816) until Java was handed to the Dutch.
Stamford Raffles was known as Thomas before his arrival to Java, then he was known as Stamford.
In May 1812, Stamford Raffles took over Palembang.
On the 20th June 1812, Stamford Raffles attacked the Kraton (castle) of Yogjakarta and looted its contents.
He was initiated as a Freemason in 1812 in Java and by 1813 he rose to Master Mason.
During the tenure of Stamford Raffles in Java, he was to be dismissed due to his poor financial achievement and financial impropriety.
Lord Hasting was not going to support the dismissal of Stamford Raffles. Therefore, Stamford Raffles sailed to England to clear his name and met with Napoleon in exile enroute.
In 1817, Stamford Raffles published the History of Java.
Stamford Raffles received a knighthood from the Prince Regent, King George IV.
Stamford Raffles was known as Thomas before his arrival to Java, then he was known as Stamford.
In 1818, Stamford Raffles was appointed as the Governor-General of Fort Malborough, Bencoolen (1818–1823).
Stamford Raffles founded Singapore in 1819 while being the Governor-General of Fort Malborough, Bencoolen.
On the 6th February 1819, a treaty was signed with Sultan Hussein Shah and Temenggong Abdul Rahman, establishing Singapore as a British Establishment.
Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) was replaced in March 1823, and was immediately given an official reprimand from London for the takeover of Nias.
He then tendered his resignation.
He was not granted a pension and was forced to pay GBP 22,272 for losses incurred during his administration.
After Stamford Raffles tendered his resignation, he stayed in Singapore for nine months to establish the Singapore Institute where he outlawed gambling, with heavy taxation upon drunkenness and opium-smoking and banned slavery.
Stamford Raffles and his family left for England on the 2nd February 1824 upon the Fame but the ship caught fire, burning their possessions which included manuscripts of many kinds and specimens.
They finally returned to England on 22 August 1824.
Upon his return to England, he entered the high society in London.
In April 1826 in England, he was made the president of the Zoological Society.
Super Curriculum
It was in Java he was initiated as a Freemason in 1812 and by 1813 he rose to Master Mason.
Contemporaries
The Contemporaries of Stamford Raffles are amongst the following;
William Brown Ramsey was the only friend when he worked as a temporary clerk and it was a lifelong friendship.
Family of Choice
He (1781–1826) had married twice and all his children had died in their youth.
Stamford Raffles was first wed to Olivia Marriame Devenish (16 February 1771–26 November 1814) at St. George, Bloomsbury on 14th March 1805. She was a widow ten years his senior in 1804. She died in Java, where she was laid to rest in the European Cemetery at Batavia West Java. They did not have any children together. Olivia Marianme Fancourt was a widow prior to, the Mr. Jacob Cassivelaun Fancourt as assistant surgeon in Madras (d. in May 1800 in Raikot, Punjab.)
Olivia Marriame Devenish (16 February 1771–26 November 1814) was the illegitimate child of an unknown Circassian women by George (or Godfrey Devenish of Castle Dana, Roscommon, Ireland. She herself had given birth to an illegitimate daughter of John Hamilton Dempster. John Bastin.
Stamford Raffles remarried in 1817 in England to Sophia Hull.
Sophia Hull is a daughter of an Irish landowner.
Ella was the only child to die in England, and not in Bencoolen.
Flora Nightingale (19 September 1823–28 November 1823, died in Bencoolen)
Scandals
Stamford Raffles’ Self-Representation and Moral Character
Stamford Raffles had his own peculiarities, amongst them are;
He had a gentle temperament towards the Malays in the Malay Peninsula, yet he was not kind to the people of Sumatera and the Javanese.
He studied and preserved Malay knowledge and some elements of Malay civilization, and protected Malacca physically and through epistolary affairs with EIC, pleading his employers not to destroy Malacca, and physically travelled to Malacca to save the place from bombing nad other destructions.
On the other hand, he destroyed the Javanese Kratons and massacred other people in Sumatera.
He was officially christened as Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles in 1784, whom was named after his godfathers, Mr. Stamford and Mr. Bingley, though Stamford Raffles denied Mr. Bingley to be his godfather.
Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) lived under the reign of King George III (r. 1760–1820) who had suffered from mental illness and King George IV (r. 1820–1830) who was known as “the first gentleman of England” by the British people. Therefore, the worldview of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) is of the belief of Graeco-Roman Worldview in the Georgian Era (1714–1830) and the Anglican Church along with the reason of positivism. He was also a fatalist.
The personal and professional agenda of Stamford Raffles which constitutes his morality was to secure financial stability for his family, and build an excellent career.
The Surface & Social Demeanor
How he appeared to others in public, social, and professional settings. His social charm, outward temperament, visible work style, and physical presence.
Navigated London’s high society and elite scientific circles with ease despite his humble beginnings, securing patrons, a knighthood, and social prominence.
Exhibited an approachable, courteous disposition in personal interactions, allowing him to easily cultivate relationships with both British elites and native Malay royalty.
Stamford Raffles was a man of punctuality. He maintained an outward reputation for extreme personal order, promptness, and strict adherence to schedules.
Appeared constantly active, restless, and driven to those around him—an administrator who pushed himself and his subordinates tirelessly.
His outward vitality was frequently interrupted by severe, visible bouts of illness, headaches, and jaundice, which forced him into periods of physical collapse and he limped.
As he experienced severe headaches, Raffles treats his headaches with calomel, a mercuric chloride, which he abused.
Observable Actions & Historical Facts
What he physically and historically did. His documented deeds, daily administrative habits, field research, and political decrees.
Stamford Raffles was gifted animals and had a sunbear who enjoyed champagne.
Habitually ingested calomel (mercuric chloride, a toxic mercury compound) to manage recurring tropical illnesses and severe headaches.
Exploited internal succession disputes between Sultan Hussein and Temenggong Abdul Rahman to secure the 1819 Treaty establishing British Singapore.
Issued official proclamations banning slavery and debt-bondage in Bencoolen and Singapore.
Passed regulations outlawing gambling houses and placing heavy taxes on opium and alcohol.
Internal Drives & Psychological Traits
Who he was on the inside. His core psychological motivations, internal values, cognitive framework, and subconscious biases.
Fierce Ambition Driven by Insecurity.
Internally motivated by his family’s poverty and his abrupt removal from school at age 14, driving a lifelong psychological need to prove his worth and achieve social mobility.
Restless Intellectual Curiosity
Possessed an innate, compulsion-driven mind that required continuous empirical engagement with science, history, and administration.
Stamford Raffles was in a constant quest for knowledge which reflected in his career that aligned with his values showcasing his morality.
Further testaments for his quest for knowledge are the cataloguing of ancient buildings in Java, cataloguing botanical and zoological drawings, information, and specimens in his journals, the establishment of the Singapore Institution.
Georgian Positivist Worldview
Internally processed the world through 19th-century Enlightenment thinking, a Graeco-Roman Worldview and Anglicanism —valuing systematic order, taxonomy, and empirical observation.
Paternalistic Eurocentrism
Held an ingrained psychological conviction that Great Britain was the supreme height of human civilization, viewing indigenous populations as “children” who required European guidance to advance.
Duplicitous Realpolitik Mindset
Possessed an internal pragmatism that enabled him to comfortably compartmentalize his high-minded principles while employing deceit when imperial interests demanded it.
Filial Piety & Family Loyalty
Stamford Raffles led a life of filial piety, he maintained a deep, genuine internal devotion to his family, particularly his mother, regularly sending money and expressing deep affection in private letters.
Ethical Framework & Intentions
His standard of right versus wrong and his underlying motives. The moral ideals he championed versus the ethical boundaries he was willing to violate.
Anti-Slavery Conviction
Maintained a firm, active ethical stance against human trafficking, outlawing the slave trade and debt-bondage under British jurisdiction (a stance that alienated conservative church leaders in England).
Anti-Vice Ideology
Viewed gambling, alcoholism, and unregulated opium consumption as social vices that destroyed human potential, taking direct administrative steps to suppress them.
Educational Philanthropy
Believed it was a moral obligation to protect regional literature, preserve indigenous heritage, and provide structured education to native populations.
Sanctioning Violence & Plunder
Violated basic ethical standards of sovereignty by ordering the violent sacking, looting, and subjugation of the native court of Yogyakarta.
Deceptive Relabeling for Imperial Gain
Intentionally branded native trade rivals as “pirates” to delegitimize their autonomy and justify British commercial hegemony.
Personal & Financial Self-Interest
Primary drivers of his career were clearing personal debts, securing financial independence for his family, and building his own personal legacy—frequently conflating state interest with personal gain.
Miscellaneous
Sources for Biography
These are the sources used in the Biography of Stamford Raffles in this website.
Stamford Raffles. “Minute on the Singapore Institution.” 1823.
Stamford Raffles. Statement of the Services of Sir Stamford Raffles with an Introduction by John Bastin. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. 1978.
Charles Edward Wurtzburg. Raffles of the Eastern Isles. 1984.
Donald Davies, “Olivia and Sophia Raffles” Malaya in History: The Magazine of the Malayan Historical Society. Volume 3. Number 2. July 1957. Edited by Mubin Sheppard. Published in Kuala Lumpur: The Malayan Historical Society in Kuala Lumpur.
Eli Solomon, ‘Raffles Reviewed — Sir Thomas Raffles 175 years later’ an Exhibition Organized by the National Museum of Singapore Commemorating Raffles Landing at Singapore on the Evening of 28th January 1819.’ JMBRAS Vol.67 Part 1 no.266. Edited by Mubin Sheppard. June 1994.
Henry Sackville Barlow. Swettenham. 1995.
Gallop. A.T. and Kratz E.U., The Legacy of the Malay Letter. London: The British Library. 1994.
John Bastin. Letters and Books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles. The Tang Holdings Collection of Autograph Letters and Books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles. Singapore: Editions Didier Millet. 2009.
John Bastin. Sir Stamford Raffles and Some of His Friends and Contemporaries. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. 2019.
Khairudin Aljuneid. Translated by Ibrahim Almahdaly and Norziati Rosman. Melayu di Mata Raffles: Sebuah Kritikan kepada Orientalisme. P. xiii. This book is a translation of Rethinking Raffles: A Study of Stamford Raffles’ Discourse on Amongst Malays. 2005
R. Coupland. Raffles: 1781–1826, 2nd edition (London: Oxford University Press, 1934).
Rahimin Affandi Abd. Rahim & Siti Maimunah binti Kahal. “Ilmu Kolonial dan Islamisasi Alam Melayu: Analisis Kritikal,” Sejarah. No. 26., Bil. 1, June 2017. (Pp. 33–49)
Rev. W. Cross, “Stamford Raffles.” Nelson’s Malayan Readers: A Series of Readers for English Schools in Malaya, Book VI, Compiled by H.R Cheeseman and Eric Gillett. Singapore: Malaya Publishing House, Ltd.
Sir Stamford Raffles Lodge No. 7444 E.C. https://www.sirstamfordraffles.com/about_us
Syed Hussein Alatas. Thomas Stamford Raffles: Schemer or Reformer? Singapore: NUS Press. 2020.


the Timeline Of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826)
Stamford Raffles was birthed on the Anne while was enroute from Port Morant, Africa to England on the 6th July 1781.
Anne is a ship that was built in Scotland, which changed ownership from Hibberts & Co. of Glasgow to Moran in 1782, at Port Morant, Jamaica on the 6th July 1781
On the 4th July 1784. Stamford Raffles’ younger sister, Harriet, (1783) was christened in the same ceremony held at Eaton Bishop Church in Herefordshire.
Stamford Raffles younger sister Leonora (8 July 1785–3 March 1791) was born.
Stamford Raffle’s younger sister Elizabeth (1787 -?) was born.
Stamford Raffles’ younger brother Benjamin (12 April 1788- 15 April 1788) was born.
Stamford Raffle’s younger sister Mary Ann (21 May 1789) was born.
In 1793, Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) entered Mansion House Boarding School, Hammersmith, West London.
Ann Raffles (b. 9 April 1793, youngest sister was born.
Schooling
Taken out of school.
His employment began in 1795, at the age of fourteen years old, at Leadenhall Street as a temporary clerk in the secretary’s office.
Raffles was in Leadenhall Street as a temporary clerk in the secretary’s office through the influence of his uncle Mr. Hamond. His appointment in the East India Company was confirmed in 1800 and in 1802, Raffles was earning GBP 70 a year.
His appointment in the East India Company was confirmed in 1800 and in 1802, Stamford Raffles was earning GBP 70 a year.
His appointment in the East India Company was confirmed in 1800 and in 1802, Raffles was earning GBP 70 a year
Stamford Raffles arrived in Penang in September 1805 and remarkably, made time to study the Malay Language and do extra work.
On 8 March 1805, Stamford Raffles was gazetted as Assistant Secretary to the new Governor of Penang the Hon. Philip Dundas.
Stamford Raffles was first wed to Olivia Marriame Devenish (16 February 1771–26 November 1814) at St. George, Bloomsbury on 14th March 1805. She was a widow ten years his senior in 1804. She died in Java, where she was laid to rest in the European Cemetery at Batavia West Java. They did not have any children together.
September 1805 Arrived in Penang
Raffles had his first encounter with Malay Muslims in Penang in 1805 when he was the Assistant to the Secretary of the Governor of Penang.
There were frictions between Governor Dundas and his then secretary, Pearson.
This led to the appointed of Stamford Raffles by Governor Dundas to be his secretary on the 29th August 1806.
Stamford Raffles was soon appointed as assistant secretary to Council William Clubley on the 22nd March 1807.
At the end of July 1808, he went to Malacca and returned to Penang on 29th October 1808.
He saved Malacca from being destroyed by EIC, by epistolary and physical presence.
In October 1810, Stamford Raffles was appointed as Agent to the Governor-General of the Malay States by Lord Minto, the Governor-General of India (1807– 1813), and moved to Melaka to plan the invasion of Java.
The successful capture of Java led to Stamford Raffles being appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Java (1811–1816).
He was the Governor until Java was handed to the Dutch.
In May 1812, Stamford Raffles took over Palembang.
He then attacked the people of Java by attacking the Kraton (castle) of Yogjakarta and looting its contents on the 20th June 1812.
It was in Java he was initiated as a Freemason in 1812 and by 1813 he rose to Master Mason.
1813 he rose to Master Mason.
During Raffles tenure in Java, he was to be dismissed due to his poor financial achievement and financial impropriety.
Lord Hasting was not going to support the dismissal of Stamford Raffles. Therefore, Stamford Raffles sailed to England to clear his name and met with Napoleon in exile enroute.
In a twist of events, in 1817, Stamford Raffles published the History of Java, received knighthood from the Prince Regent, King George IV.
He was known as Thomas before his arrival to Java, where was known as Stamford and upon receiving knighthood, his principal name was Stamford.
Stamford Raffles remarried in 1817 in England to Sophia Hull. Sophia Hull is a daughter of an Irish landowner.
In 1818, he was appointed as the Governor-General of Fort Malborough, Bencoolen (1818–1823) during which time he founded Singapore in 1819.”
His children i. Leopold Stamford (b. 1818–1821) and ii. Charlotte (b. 1818–1822) were born.
By 30th January 1819, a five-preliminary agreement had been signed with the Temenggong Abdul Rahman allowing the British to establish a factory on the island of Singapore. According to Captain J.G.F. Crawford, one day after this treaty had been concluded, the Union Jack was unceremoniously hoisted on the shore.
On the 6 February 1819, a treaty was signed with Sultan Hussein Shah and Temenggong Abdul Rahman, establishing Singapore as a British Establishment.
Stamford Raffles’ third child, Stamford Marsden (b. 1820-1822) was born.
His son Leopold Stamford (b. 1818–1821) died in Bencoolen.
His fourth child, Ella Sophia Raffles (1821–1840) was born.
Two of his children, Charlotte (b. 1818–1822) and Stamford Marsden (b. 1820-1822), died in the same year in Bencoolen.
Stamford Raffle’s fifth child, Flora Nightingale (19 September 1823–28 November 1823, died in Bencoolen).
Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) was replaced in March 1823, and was immediately given an official reprimand from London for the takeover of Nias.
He then tendered his resignation.
But stayed in Singapore for nine months to establish the Singapore Institute, outlawed gambling, with heavy taxation upon drunkenness and opium-smoking and banned slavery.
Stamford Raffles was not granted a pension and was forced to pay GBP 22,272 for losses incurred during his administration.
He and his family left for England on 2 February 1824 upon Fame but the ship caught fire, burning their possessions which included manuscripts of many kinds and specimens.
They finally returned to England on 22 August 1824.
In April 1826 in England, he was made the president of the Zoological Society.
He died due to a stroke caused by a brain tumour. He was prohibited to be buried in the St. Mary’s Church of Hendon due to his anti-slavery stance. His body’s location was unknown until in 1914, it was discovered to be in a vault. Then, he was finally laid to rest at the St. Mary’s Church Hendon, England
Ella Sophia Raffles (1821–1840) died in England
The body of Stamford Raffles location was unknown until in 1914, it was discovered to be in a vault. Then, he was finally laid to rest at the St. Mary’s Church Hendon, England
Malay Colonial Identity
The Construction of Authority in Stamford Raffles’ Malay Colonial identity
The authority of the Malay colonial identity in the writings of Stamford Raffles was based upon the perceived authority and knowledge he had upon the Malays. He had studied them and their manuscripts which seeded Western Malay Studies; he bought, copied, collected and preserved their manuscripts; he knew the Malay an French languages; and had communications with the Malays of Royalty, nobility, commoners, and the enslaved for an extensive period and intense measure. He knew them intimately as he lived amongst them, befriended them, governed them, and Raffles did some double-dealing to play off two rival factions from the declining Sultanate of Riau and Johore.
Stamford Raffles was fluent in the Malay and French languages.
He began his study of the Malay language on his voyage to Penang.
He studied the Malay language due to Lord Minto who took into account the reason of Warren Hasting’s impeachment where he came to the realisation of the vitality of the proper government of foreign races depended on the ability of the governors to understand and speak the language of the governed.
“When Raffles left, after only two years’ residence in Singapore, he enjoined on his successors the need to cultivate the friendship of the Rulers of the Malay States; but no one connected with our possessions in the Straits appears to have remembered Raffles’ advice, or shown any real interest in the Malays of the Peninsula. …Sir Harry Ord was an exception…” Frank Swettenham. Footprints in Malaya.
Intimacy and the Construction of Malay Imageries
Stamford Raffles had various relationships with the Malays – the direct communications he had with Malays of Royalty, nobility, commoners, and the enslaved for an extensive period and intense measure.
Malay Colonial Identity of Stamford Raffles
This section examines how Raffles portrayed the Malays in his writings, identifying the recurring descriptions, assumptions, and themes that shaped his representations.
During the time of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), England was experiencing revolutions and involved in wars; the American Revolution (1775–1783), the French Revolution (1789–1799), the Industrial Revolutions (1760–1840), and the Napolean Wars (1803–1815). It was also the period of the Georgian Era (1714–1830) and the Romantic Movement (1798–1837). Due to the circumstances of his family, Stamford Raffles had limited opportunities in England to establish himself, therefore he went to the East. Employed by the East India Company, Stamford Raffles took to the East.
The life of the commonfolk Malays was generally untouched by EIC as the head of the political institutions were the Sultan. The Malay economy composed of agrarian and maritime trades, while the Malay culture was strong yet the political figure head faced increase pressure and oppression from external forces. Stamford Raffles mostly governed the Malays.
According to Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) the Malayan group is peopled by different nations.[1] One of them being the Malay Nation — the Malay is its own nation, speaking the same singular language, and has many states[2] whose nature is a maritime nation.[3]
The Malays are native[4] to the Eastern Isles, settlers,[5] yet their origins are unknown;[6] they are not the original stock[7] as they originated from Tartar.[8] Therefore, there is a probability that Maláyus had derived their names from a character Si Maláyu, which means a wanderer, in a dramatic performance of the people of Borneo.[9] The settlement of the Malays are to be found only on the Malay Peninsular and the shores of the island of Sumatera;[10] with the first established Malay government was in Singapore then Johor.[11] The Malays of the Peninsula are the most pure form of Malays, they are the least adulterated in their character, usages, and manners.[12] The identity of the Malay people are being maritime and commercial people prior to the coming of the Dutch, yet, the Dutch destroyed their identity through oppression.[13]
The Malays had their own wild traditions prior to the coming of Islam and their “true” history began with the coming of Islam.[14] Singapore was once an ancient Capital for the Malay Kings.[15] The first established Malay government was in Singapore then Johor.[16] Malacca was once a flourished kingdom.[17] The Malaca code is the material culture that symbolises the establishment of Islam in Malacca in faith and practice.[18] Pertaining the economy in the Eastern Archipelago, the interior of larger islands are agrarian while the coastal areas are maritime and commercial; the people of the interior collect valuable raw material and sell it to native traders to be sold elsewhere.[19]
When the Europeans came, Malacca was a flourishing kingdom[20] and the Malays were Muslim and their presence was not without impact; the Portuguese broke the power of the native states, the Dutch brought trauma and degenerated the Malays[21] and the British restored the dignity of the Malays.[22] The Europeans were not the only ones to have influenced the Malays, the Indians and Siamese have done so to. There is a subculture in the Malay race, the Melayu-Jawi who are Malays mixed with Indian heritage and the Jawi script that is adopted from the Arabs per coming of Islam as the Malays have no original written language of their own;[23] an ancient Malay Script influenced by Siam.[24]
In colonial history the Malays were evaluated through commerce.[25] They are polite savages[26] yet inherited bad behaviors from the Dutch, such monopoly of trade;[27] and effected by the Dutch to becoming pirates, indolent and apathy due to desperation to which is subsiding quickly due to the British.[28] The superiority of the Malay States are accounted upon their relations with the British,[29] therefore the Malay States of Kedah, Johor, and Malacca are superior Malay States.[30]
[1] “The island of Sumatra, as well as the islands of Jawa, Tana Ugi or Bugis land, (Celebes) Súlu, and the Moluccas, which with Borneo compose what may be properly termed the Malayan groupe, are peopled by nations radically distinct from the Malays, who speak languages entirely different, and use various written characters, original and peculiar to each. These nations are governed by their several laws and institutions; and if we except the state of Menangcabaw on the island of Sumatra, it is on the shores of these islands only, and in the Malay peninsula, that the Malays are to be found.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[2] “I cannot but consider the Malayu nation, as one people, speaking one language, though -spread over so wide a space, and preserving their character and customs, in all the maritime states lying between the Súlu seas, and the southern ocean, and bounded longitudinally by Sumatra and the western side of Papua or New Guinea.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[3] “…the Institutions and Regulations of so extensive a maritime nation must be interesting.” Stamford Raffles. Ibid. P. 105.
[4] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Lord Minto, dated 4 May 1811. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. P. 31.
[5] “The laws and customs of the Malays, may be considered, either separately, or as they have reference to those of the more ancient and original inhabitants of the eastern islands, with whom they are now so intimately connected. What may be termed, the proper laws and customs of the Malayu nation, as it at present exists, will first be adverted to.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 104.
[6] “Whatever may have been the origin of the Malayu nation, the primary population of these various and extensive islands, could never, according to any natural inference, have proceeded from the Malays, though the reverse may probably have been the case, whatever may have been borrowed from a more foreign source.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[7] “Whatever may have been the origin of the Malayu nation, the primary population of these various and extensive islands, could never, according to any natural inference, have proceeded from the Malays, though the reverse may probably have been the case, whatever may have been borrowed from a more foreign source.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[8] “Retaining much of that boldness which marks the Tartar stock, from whence they are supposed to have sprung, they have acquired a softness, not less remarkable in their manners than in their language. Few people attend more to the courtesies of society.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 10.
[9] “In the dramatic performances of the Bálians, Klána Tánjung Púra is the same with Si Maláyu, which means a wanderer, and from which it has been supposed probable that the Maláyus have derived their name.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. 96. 571 “…it is on the shores of these islands (Sumatera) only, and in the Malay peninsula, that the Malays are to be found.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[10] “…it is on the shores of these islands (Sumatera) only, and in the Malay peninsula, that the Malays are to be found.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103
[11] “Of the Malay Peninsula, the principal states entitled to notice on the western side, are those of Kedeh, Maláca and Johór; and on the eastern, those of Tringáno, Patáni and Pahang. From these I have obtained and collected several copies of the Undang Undang Kedeh, the Undang Un- dang Maláca, and the Undang Undang Johor. The states on the eastern side of the peninsula, with the exception of Patáni, which has been considerably influenced by the Siamese, seem generally to have admitted the superiority of the Malay government, first established at Sín hapúra, and afterwards at Johor.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.106.
[12] “With respect to the internal regulations of government, police, property, and what in all Malay codes occupies so large a share, slavery: the Malay states on the peninsula have been selected, as well on account of their connection with the English government at Penang and Malaca, as for the still more important reason, in a philosophical point of view, of the Malays, being according to the theory I have laid down, to be found here the least adulterated in their character, usages and manners. They are bounded by the Siamese, to the north, whose encroachments and establishments in the peninsula, as they have from time to time taken place, may easily be defined. The Malays seem here to have occupied a country previously unappropriated; for if we except an inconsiderable race of Caffries, who are occasionally found near the mountains, and a few tribes of the Orang benúa, there does not exist a vestige of a nation anterior to the Malays, in the whole peninsula.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. Pp. 107–108.
[13] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7
[14] “He (John Leyden) was aware that in these islands, as well as on the continent of India, the commencement of authentic history was only [found] to be dated from the introduction of Mahometanism but in the wild traditions of the Malays, he thought, he sometimes discovered a glimmering of light, which might perhaps serve to illustrate an earlier period. These glimmerings, he was accustomed to say, were very faint but, in the absence of all other lights, they were worth pursuing; they would, at all events, account for and explain many of the peculiar institutions and customs of the people, and serve to make his countrymen better acquainted with a race who appeared to him to possess the greatest claims on their consideration and attention.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 5.
[15] John Bastin. Raffles and Hastings: Private Exchanges behind the Founding of Singapore. P. 49. “The successors of Sang Nila Utama were Paduka Sri Wikrama, Sri Rama Wikrama, and Sekander Shah, who, being driven out of Singa pura by the Majapáhit forces, afterwards established the city of Malaca. His successor, Mahomed Shah, first embraced Mahomedanism, in the year 1276.” — Malayan Annals. Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. 146.
[16] “Of the Malay Peninsula, the principal states entitled to notice on the western side, are those of Kedeh, Maláca and Johór; and on the eastern, those of Tringáno, Patáni and Pahang. From these I have obtained and collected several copies of the Undang Undang Kedeh, the Undang-Undang Maláca, and the Undang Undang Johor. The states on the eastern side of the peninsula, with the exception of Patáni, which has been considerably influenced by the Siamese, seem generally to have admitted the superiority of the Malay government, first established at Sín hapúra, and afterwards at Johor.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.106.
[17] “In the following sketch, which defines the laws and usages of the Malays at sea, the Maláca code has been selected for the text, as well on account of the admitted superiority of that once flourishing kingdom…” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 130.
[18] “The Malaca code appears to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhammed Shah, the first sovereign of Maláca, recorded in the Malayu annals to have embraced the Muhammedan faith. This circum-stance is understood to have taken place about the year of the Christian era, 1276. The origin of the Malay code may therefore be considered as nearly coeval with the first establishment of Islamism among the Malays.” On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 130.
[19] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 8.
[20] “In the following sketch, which defines the laws and usages of the Malays at sea, the Maláca code has been selected for the text, as well on account of the admitted superiority of that once flourishing kingdom…” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. 130.
[21] Dutch oppression has brought regress to the Malays – Among a people so unsophisticated and so free from prejudices, it is obvious that a greater scope is given to the influence of example; that, in proportion as their intercourse with Europeans encreases and a free commerce adds to their resources, along with the wants which will be created and the luxuries supplied, the humanizing arts of life will also find their way and we may anticipate a much more rapid improvement than in nations who, having once arrived at a high point of civilization and retrograded in the scale, are now hardened by the recollection of what they once were, are brought up in a contempt for every thing beyond their own narrow circle and who have, for centuries, bent under the double load of foreign tyranny and priestly intolerance. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[22] “The valour of Portugal broke the power of the native states, and left them exposed to the more selfish policy of their successors. The Dutch had no sooner established their capital at Batavia than, not satisfied with transferring to it the emporium of Bautain, they conceived the idea of making it the sole and only de- pot of the commerce of the archipelago. Had this object been combined with a liberal policy, and had the local circumstances of Batavia not ob- structed it, the effect might have been different and, instead of the ruin and desolation which ensued throughout a large portion of these islands, they might have advanced in civilization while they contributed to raise the prosperity and support the ascendancy of the Dutch metropolis. But when we advert to the greedy policy which swallowed up the resources of this extensive archipelago in a narrow and rigid monopoly, and that, instead of leaving trade to accumulate, as it had previously done at the natural emporia, it was forced by means of arbitrary and restrictive regu- lations into one which, independent of other disadvantages, soon proved the grave of the majority of those who were obliged to resort to it, we shall find the cause which made it as ruinous to the Dutch as to the peo- ple. By attempting too much, they lost what, under other circumstances might have been turned to advantage; and the native states, deprived of their fair share of commerce, abandoned all attempts and sunk into the comparative insignificance in which they were found at the period when our traders began to navigate those seas from Madras and Bengal. The destruction of the native trade of the archipelago by this withering policy, may be considered as the origin of many of the evils and of all the piracies of which we now complain. A maritime and commercial people, suddenly deprived of all honest employment or the means of respectable subsistence, either sunk into apathy and indolence, or expended their natural energies in piratical attempts to recover, by force and plunder, what they had been deprived of by policy and fraud. In this state of decay, they continued to degenerate, till the appearance of the British traders revived their suppressed and nearly extinguished energies, and awoke to new life the commerce and enterprise of this interesting portion of the globe.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. Pp. 6–7.
[23] “The word Jahwí so much insisted on by the author of the “Rough Sketch,” is the Malay term for any thing mixed or crossed; as when the language of one country is written in the character of another, it is term- ed B’hása Jahwí or mixed language; or when a child is born of a Kiling father and Malay mother, it is called Anak Jahwí, a child of mixed race. Thus the Malayu language, being written in the Arabic character is term- ed B’hasa Jahwi; the Malays, as a nation, distinct from the fixed popu- lation of the eastern islands, not possessing any written character, but what they borrow from the Arabss.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 127.
[24] “It is easy and natural to account for the Malays having with their religion adopted the written character of the Arabs, and I have no hesitation in asserting that neither Malay writings nor inscriptions, in their is present characters, can be traced back to an area of greater antiquity than the invention of the modern Arabic alphabet, or beyond the period at which the great intercourse between the Arabians and eastern nations took place. Admitting, however, that more early writings did exist there is no reason why they may not have been preserved on Sumatra, in the more ancient and original characters of the Battas, the Rejangs or the Lampungs: on Java, and the Celebes, in the characters of the Javanese and Bugis nations, and even on the Malay peninsula, in some modification of the Siamese character. Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 126.
[25] “From the period at which Europeans first visited these islands, their civil history may be summed up in few words: it is included in that of their commerce.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 6.
[26] “In these countries, where there is very little justice to be obtained from regularly established courts, and where an individual considers himself justified in taking the law into his own hands accordingly, the Maláyu is always prepared to avenge with his krís the slightest insult on the spot; but the knowledge that such an immediate appeal is always at hand, prevents the necessity of its often being resorted to, an habitual politeness ensues, and it has often been said, that if the Maláyus are savages, they are by far the most polite savages that we know of. If this effect is produced on the wilder and less civilized Maláyu, and has equal force with the more adventurous and warm-hearted Búgis, it may be easily conceived the Javans have not escaped it.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 393
[27] “A circumstance highly injurious to the commerce of the Malayan nations is the trading monopoly, which in most of the Malayan ports is actually assumed by the chiefs. Of this monopoly there is no trace in the Undang úndang of the Maláyus, or in the fragments of their history which have yet come to light, and it is a question whether this pernicious practice has not been copied from the monopoly regulations of the Dutch.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 262.
[28] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 8.
[29] “With respect to the internal regulations of government, police, property, and what in all Malay codes occupies so large a share, slavery: the Malay states on the peninsula have been selected, as well on account of their connection with the English government at Penang and Malaca, as for the still more important reason, in a philosophical point of view, of the Malays, being according to the theory I have laid down, to be found here the least adulterated in their character, usages and manners. They are bounded by the Siamese, to the north, whose encroachments and establishments in the peninsula, as they have from time to time taken place, may easily be defined. The Malays seem here to have occupied a coun- try previously unappropriated; for if we except an inconsiderable race of Caffries, who are occasionally found near the mountains, and a few tribes of the Orang benúa, there does not exist a vestige of a nation anterior to the Malays, in the whole peninsula.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. Pp. 107–108.
[30] The institutions of the smaller states, as of Salingór, Perak and others, may only require notice as far as they differ from the general code of the superior states.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 107.
According to Stamford Raffles, the Malays had a thriving civilization prior to the coming of Islam,[1] yet Islam brought regress, therefore, the civilisation of the Malay is rude and uncivilised.[2] In contradiction to regress, each Malay State on the Malay Peninsula has their own Undang-undang, legal system,[3] with their own specialties.[4] The Malaca code is the material culture that symbolises the establishment of Islam in Malacca in faith and practice.[5] Asides from a high reverence for ancestry and nobility of descent, they are more influenced and quicker discerners of superiority of individual talent than is usual among people not advanced in civilization.[6] While the calendar was of the cycles of the Malays are adopted from the Siamese.[7] There is also the Muslim Hegira calendar used by the Muslims.[8]
[1] “Among many of them, traces of a higher state of civilization are obvious and, where opportunity has been afforded, even in our own times, they have been found capable of receiving a high state of intellectual improvement.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 10.
[2] “From the comparative rude and uncivilized character of the Malay nation, neither learned disquisition nor very close coincidence is to be looked for; but simple ideas simply expressed, may illustrate character better, than scientific arrangement or refined composition. And in this point of view, however local or particular the subject may be, the Institutions and Regulations of so extensive a maritime nation must be interesting.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. Pp. 104–105.
[3] “Of the Malay Peninsula, the principal states entitled to notice on the western side, are those of Kedeh, Maláca and Johór; and on the eastern, those of Tringáno, Patáni and Pahang. From these I have obtained and collected several copies of the Undang Undang Kedeh, the Undang Un- dang Maláca, and the Undang Undang Johor. The states on the eastern side of the peninsula, with the exception of Patáni, which has been con- siderably influenced by the Siamese, seem generally to have admitted the superiority of the Malay government, first established at Sín hapúra, and afterwards at Johor.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.106.
[4] “The Maláca code stated to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhammed Shah, of which I (Stamford Raffles 1781–1826) have three copies, treats principally of commercial and maritime usages, and in these branches may form the text of a Digest of the Malay Laws; whilst the institutions of Johor, from the intimate connection which appears always to have existed between Malaca and the southern part of the peninsula, may be useful as a supplement on these points; at the same time that it will branch out into civil and criminal law generally, and the general principles of communication between the different states. The Kedeh code may in like manner form the text for such parts of the Institutions as may be most applicable to the intercourse of Europeans, and tend best to a general understanding of the character and usages of the Malay countries in the immediate vicinity of the British settlements. This state, until the establishment of the English at Pulau Pinang, possessed a respectable commerce, and still retains its Malayan government and institutions applicable to internal affairs; though reduced in external importance, The institutions of the smaller states, as of Salingór, Perak and others, may only require notice as far as they differ from the general code of the superior states.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia P.107.
[5] “The Malaca code appears to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhamed Shah, the first sovereign of Maláca, recorded in the Malayu annals to have embraced the Muhammedan faith. This circum- stance is understood to have taken place about the year of the Christian era, 1276. The origin of the Malay code may therefore be considered as nearly coeval with the first establishment of Islamism among the Malays.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 130.
[6] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[7] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Philip Dundas, dated 6 July 186. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. Pp. 9–12.
[8] John Bastin. Sir Stamford Raffles and Some of His Friends and Contemporaries. P. 45
According to Stamford Raffles, the Malay society is feudal,[1] yet they mingle indiscriminately in all society.[2] There is the ruling class, commonfolk, and slaves. The Malays have their own legal institution which is also their code of conduct, including matters pertaining slavery. Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) had written that slavery is an evil spread throughout the Malayan countries.[3] The sources are piracy, prisoner of war, and kidnapping.[4] Slavery occupies a large share in all the Malay annals,[5] while, debtslavery is tolerated and acknowledged by Malay law.[6]
[1] “In the feudal notions and habits of this (Malay) people.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 5.
[2] They have no knowledge of the odious distinction of castes, but mingle indiscriminately in all society. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[3] Connected with this evil, though of much wider extent, is the system of slavery in the Malayan countries, Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 259.
[4] “The sources of slavery in the Malayan countries are chiefly piracy at sea, captivity in war, manstealing along the coast, and the penalties enacted in the Malayan law respecting debts and sundry misdemeanors. The surviving crews of vessels which fall into the hands of the pirates are generally disposed of by sale at the first market. The captives taken in the constant wars which the Malayan chieftains carry on against each other, are generally employed in domestic occupations, tending cattle, and cultivating the ground, where there is no opportunity of bringing them to market.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 260.
[5] “With respect to the internal regulations of government, police, property, and what in all Malay codes occupies so large a share, slavery…” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 107.
[6] Stamford Raffles. “Minute on the Singapore Institution.” 1823. P. 18. Sourced from the National Archives of Malaysia, ascension number 2006/0007837.
According to Stamford Raffles, the Malays have their literary tradition,[1] however, the Malay language, literature (manuscripts), and popular narratives are adopted from India.[2] The Malays are an intellectual nation as they derive their laws from their annals and book of traditions; holistic laws being – the whole body of the Malay laws; customs and usages, as far as they can be considered as original, under the heads of government; property; slavery; inheritance; and commerce[3] with each Malay State on the Malay Peninsula has their own Undang-undang, legal system,[4] with their own specialties.[5] The intellectual traditions is not of the genius of the Malays, rather the written languages are adopted – firstly, prior to the coming of Islam, influenced by the Siamese, and secondly, after the conversion to Islam, adoption of the Arabic script.[6]
[1] Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.105.
[2] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Philip Dundas, dated 6 July 186. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. 9–12.
[3] Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) had collected Malay manuscripts according to his capacity — “in collecting Malay manuscripts of every description, and in particular, copies of the Undang Undang Malayu, which, with the various collections of Addit, or immemorial customs, and what may be usefully extracted from the Sejareh Malayu, and Akal Malayu, or annals and traditions of the Malays, comprize what may be termed the whole body of the Malay laws, customs and usages, as far as they can be considered as original, under the heads of government, property, slavery, inheritance and commerce.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.105
[4] “Of the Malay Peninsula, the principal states entitled to notice on the western side, are those of Kedeh, Maláca and Johór; and on the eastern, those of Tringáno, Patáni and Pahang. From these I have obtained and collected several copies of the Undang Undang Kedeh, the Undang-Undang Maláca, and the Undang Undang Johor. The states on the eastern side of the peninsula, with the exception of Patáni, which has been considerably influenced by the Siamese, seem generally to have admitted the superiority of the Malay government, first established at Sín hapúra, and afterwards at Johor.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.106.
[5] “The Maláca code stated to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhammed Shah, of which I (Stamford Raffles 1781–1826) have three copies, treats principally of commercial and maritime usages, and in these branches may form the text of a Digest of the Malay Laws; whilst the institutions of Johor, from the intimate connection which appears always to have existed between Malaca and the southern part of the peninsula, may be useful as a supplement on these points; at the same time that it will branch out into civil and criminal law generally, and the general principles of communication between the different states. The Kedeh code may in like manner form the text for such parts of the Institutions as may be most applicable to the intercourse of Europeans, and tend best to a general understanding of the character and usages of the Malay countries in the immediate vicinity of the British settlements. This state, until the establishment of the English at Pulau Pinang, possessed a respectable commerce, and still retains its Malayan government and institutions applicable to internal affairs; though reduced in external importance, The institutions of the smaller states, as of Salingór, Perak and others, may only require notice as far as they differ from the general code of the superior states.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.107.
[6] Jahwi in the Malay language means mixed, therefore, a Jahwi child means that the Father is Kling and mother is Malay while Bhasa Jahwi means the Malay language written in Arabic script; The Malays have no written character of their own unless adopted. “The word Jahwí so much insisted on by the author of the “Rough Sketch,” is the Malay term for any thing mixed or crossed; as when the language of one country is written in the character of another, it is term- ed B’hása Jahwí or mixed language; or when a child is born of a Kiling father and Malay mother, it is called Anak Jahwí, a child of mixed race. Thus the Malayu language, being written in the Arabic character is termed B’hasa Jahwi; the Malays, as a nation, distinct from the fixed popu- lation of the eastern islands, not possessing any written character, but what they borrow from the Arabss.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 127.
According to Stamford Raffles, the original religion of the Malays have a superficial effect on them as they still retain their moderate and temperate spirit.[1] The pre-Muslim Malays are — in the spirit of personal independence which distinguishes these people, their high sense of honour, and the habits of reasoning and reflection to which they are accustomed from their infancy…[2] they were spread all over Sumatera with Minangkabau as the capital yet the once civilization regressed due to the coming of Islam.[3]
Islam has brought regress to the Malays[4] — they become intolerant bigots and incapacitate in intellectual acumen;[5] however, due to intermingle and intercommunication, the Malay Muslims became more tolerant towards other religions,[6] yet they became missionaries for Islam in the Malay Archipelago.[7] It terms of identity, it is Islam that made the Malays distinctive from the other ethnics,[8] further established by the Malaca code is the material culture that symbolises the establishment of Islam in Malacca in faith and practice.[9] On the other hand, there is religious extremism in Sumatera – there is a religious sect in Sumatera who called themselves Putehs or Whites, they are a Muslim sect named Padri. Those who are not them are called Hitam or Black.[10] And Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) writes the Quran and Sanskrit poems to have similar rhythm.[11]
[1] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[2] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[3] Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 65
[4] “Among a people so unsophisticated and so free from prejudices, it is obvious that a greater scope is given to the influence of example; that, in proportion as their intercourse with Europeans encreases and a free commerce adds to their resources, along with the wants which will be created and the luxuries supplied, the humanizing arts of life will also find their way and we may anticipate a much more rapid improvement than in nations who, having once arrived at a high point of civilization and retrograded in the scale, are now hardened by the recollection of what they once were, are brought up in a contempt for every thing beyond their own narrow circle and who have, for centuries, bent under the double load of foreign tyranny and priestly intolerance. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9
[5] Islam brings regress – “under the pretext of instructing the Maláyus in the principles of the Mahometan religion, they inculcate the most intolerant bigotry, and render them incapable of receiving any species of useful knowledge.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 254.
[6] “This mixture of religion and tribes has tended, in some degree, to soften the intolerance of the Mahomedan system among the Malayan nations, and neither the positive authority of Islam, nor the persuasions of their Arab teachers, have hitherto been able to induce them to abandon entirely their own peculiar usages and customs.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 261.
[7] “It has been related, that the change of religion on Celebes happened just after the arrival of the Portuguese, who are said to have offered Christianity at the same time that the Maláyus offered Mahomedanism.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. xciv.
[8] “The most obvious and natural theory on the origin of the Malays, is that they did not exist as a separate and distinct nation, until the arrival of the Arabians in the eastern seas. At the present day they seem to differ from the more original nations, from which they sprung in about the same degree, as the Chuliahs of Kiling differ from the Tamul and Telinga nations, on the Coromandel coast, or the Mapillas of Malabar differ from the Nairs, both which people appear, in like manner with the Malsays, to have been gradually formed as nations, and separated from their original stock by the admixture of Arabian blood, and the introduction of the Arabic language and Moslem religion.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 127.
[9] “The Malaca code appears to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhammed Shah, the first sovereign of Maláca, recorded in the Malayu annals to have embraced the Muhammedan faith. This circum- stance is understood to have taken place about the year of the Christian era, 1276. The origin of the Malay code may therefore be considered as nearly coeval with the first establishment of Islamism among the Malays.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 130.
[10] “The tenets of the Padries require that all Mahometans shall refrain from the use of opium, from cockfighting & other Malayan vices, that they should wear a peculiar dress and submit to ecclesiastical authority – The Malays who form the population of the Coast Districts are averse to this change as altering their habits and departing from their ancient Customs – and the European Governments are actually employed in protecting them against the improvement which would necessarily follow from their adoption of the tenets of the Padries.” Stamford Raffles. 15 November 1823. Published in John Bastin. Letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles: The Tang Holdings Collection of autograph letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles. P. 154.
[11] “The Koran has been translated into the Búgis language. The use of rhyme is much less frequent than among the Maláyus; and it has been observed by Dr. Leyden, that “the melody of the verse depends on the rhythm, and the measure of some of the historical poems has, in this respect, considerable similarity to some of the specimens of Sanscrit verse.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. xcvi.
According to Stamford Raffles, there is a culture of debt-slavery[1] amongst the Malays. They are addicted to commerce, which has already given them a taste for luxuries, and this propensity they indulge to the utmost of their means;[2] the luxuries they are alike the products of the Indians and Europeans and their limit is their financial state.[3] He also writes the Malays and Indians to be similar.[4]
[1] “The Malay law stipulates, that after the decease of a debtor, his children, in the first instance, and after their death the village to which he belonged, is still liable for the debt. Thus not only the original contractors were rendered slave debtors, and they are termed, but their offspring, and eventually the people in general, reduced to the same hapless state. Under the plea of recovering these debts, and considering the people as debtors, they were compelled to work; and for the sum which ought to be paid for the pepper delivered, a deduction of sometimes half was made, in discharge of the debt; so that, in fact, the cultivators did not receive more than they would have done under the old system, and were equally bound to serve.” Stamford Raffles. Statement of the Services of Sir Stamford Raffles with an Introduction by John Bastin. P. 34.
[2] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[3] “The whole of this population, at least on the Malay Peninsula and throughout the islands, have imbibed a taste for Indian and European manufactures, and the demand is only limited by their means.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 8.
[4] “The most obvious and natural theory on the origin of the Malays, is that they did not exist as a separate and distinct nation, until the arrival of the Arabians in the eastern seas. At the present day they seem to differ from the more original nations, from which they sprung in about the same degree, as the Chuliahs of Kiling differ from the Tamul and Telinga nations, on the Coromandel coast, or the Mapillas of Malabar differ from the Nairs, both which people appear, in like manner with the Malays, to have been gradually formed as nations, and separated from their original stock by the admixture of Arabian blood, and the introduction of the Arabic language and Moslem religion.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 127.
In terms of character, according to Stamford Raffles, they are generally courteous;[1] the Malays are intellectually weak as they are dependent upon external forces for their intellectual tradition;[2] however, they do not look up to the Arabs, neither the Chinese, nor Europeans;[3] they are identifies through their exhibited love of freedom and liberty;[4] takes opium;[5] he is moderate and temperate;[6] “…has softness in manners and language, and has social grace”;[7] is not a robber but a little cunning;[8] since justice is not always accessible to him, therefore, the Malays is always prepared to avenge;[9] and on the extreme of emotions, he amoks[10] and does not endure the Malay Shame.[11]
However, things took a turn for the worst due to the oppression and trauma impacted upon by the Dutch – the Malays are known for their unpleasant character which is given by the Dutch[12] they then became pirates, apathetic, indolent out of desperation from the oppression from the Dutch.[13] Fortunately, the stereotype of the Malays, pirates, indolent and apathy is subsiding quickly die to the British.[14]
The other cultural aspect of the Malays is their cuisine, consisting of – Maláyus gulai;[15] sambal, belacan, lalab.[16] Their clothing and apparel are mostly made from the batik[17] and the men’s hair is styled usually short.[18]
The Malays are cruel towards animals[19] yet their natural environment produces good camphor[20] and gold.[21]
[1] “An European or a native, therefore, who has been accustomed to the polite and elegant manners of the Javans, or with the general courtesy of the Malayus, is struck with the unceremonious, rude, and uncivilized habits of the people of Báli.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. cxxxix.
[2] “It is easy and natural to account for the Malays having with their religion adopted the written character of the Arabs, and I have no hesitation in asserting that neither Malay writings nor inscriptions, in their is present characters, can be traced back to an area of greater antiquity than the invention of the modern Arabic alphabet, or beyond the period at which the great intercourse between the Arabians and eastern nations took place. Admitting, however, that more early writings did exist there is no reason why they may not have been preserved on Sumatra, in the more ancient and original characters of the Battas, the Rejangs or the Lampungs: on Java, and the Celebes, in the characters of the Javanese and Bugis nations, and even on the Malay peninsula, in some modification of the Siamese character. Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 126.
[3] “The Málayus, on the other hand, though accustomed to look up to the Arabs as their religious instructors, seldom hesitate to admit the superiority of both the Europeans and Chinese, both to themselves and to the Arabs, in the arts of life and general science; and it is certainly our interest to encourage them in this mode of thinking, and to prevent the increase of the Arab influence among them.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 262.
[4] The Eastern Archipelago is distinguished through their spirit of enterprise and freedom. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 8.
[5] Opium — It is much in demand on the Malay coast. Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 114.
[6] “Whatever may have been their original religion, its character does not appear to have been deeply imprinted, and they have carried the same moderate and temperate spirit into their new faith.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. Pp. 8–9.
[7] “The Malay character has softness in manners and language, and has social grace.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 10.
[8] “The Maláyu, speaking of him as an inhabitant of this island, because I am unacquainted with the character of those living at a distance, is possessed of a little more courage and activity, fond of small trade and travelling, and but seldom a robber like the Javan, whom in other respects he very much resembles. A Maláyu, who is a little cunning, will, as soon as an opportunity offers, commit a fraud, especially when he has had some loss which he wishes to retrieve.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1.1823. P. 284.
[9] “In these countries, where there is very little justice to be obtained from regularly established courts, and where an individual considers himself justified in taking the law into his own hands accordingly, the Maláyu is always prepared to avenge with his krís the slightest insult on the spot; but the knowledge that such an immediate appeal is always at hand, prevents the necessity of its often being resorted to, an habitual politeness ensues, and it has often been said, that if the Maláyus are savages, they are by far the most polite savages that we know of. If this effect is produced on the wilder and less civilized Maláyu, and has equal force with the more adventurous and warm-hearted Búgis, it may be easily conceived the Javans have not escaped it.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 393.
[10] “The phrenzy generally known by the term muck or ámok, is only another form of that fit of desperation which bears the same name among the military, and under the influence of which they rush upon the enemy, or attack a battery, in the manner of a forlorn hope. The accounts of the wars of the Javans, as well as of the Maláyus, abound with instances of warriors running ámok; of combatants, giving up all idea of preserving their own lives, rushing on the enemy, committing indiscriminate slaughter, and never surrendering themselves alive.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 332.
[11] “The inhabitants of these Islands are strikingly alive to a sense of shame; a feeling, which is heightened by the influence of a tradition among the Maláyus, that, on the first establishment of the Malayan nation, the islanders stipulated, that neither they nor their descendants should ever be put to shame. The tradition runs as follows: “Then Ampu and Maling made obeisance to Sangsapurba (a prince who had arrived in Sumatra from Western India, and who is supposed to have founded the Malayan empire) and represented to him that Demang Lebar Daon (chieftain broad leaf of Palembang), had a daughter. Sangsapurba accordingly sent to ask her in marriage; but he excused himself, alleging, that she would probably be struck with sickness, and that he would only resign her to him as a wife on certain conditions. These conditions were, that, on Sangsapurba marrying his daughter, all the family of Demang Lebar Daon should submit themselves to him; but that Sangsapurba should engage, both for himself and his posterity, that they should receive a liberal treatment; and, in particular, that when they committed a fault, they should never be exposed to shame nor opprobrious language, but if their fault was great, that they should be put to death according to the law. Sangsapurba agreed to these conditions; but he requested, in his turn, that the descendants of Demang Lebar Daon should never move any treasonable practices against his descendants, even though they should become tyrannical. ‘Very well,’ said Demang Lebar Daon; ‘but if your descendants break your agreements, probably mine will do the same.’ These conditions were mutually agreed to, and the parties swore to perform them, imprecating the divine vengeance to turn their authority upside down who should infringe these agreement. From this condition it is, that none of the Malayan rajas ever expose their Malayan subjects to disgrace or shame: they never bind them, nor hang them, nor give them opprobrious language; and whenever a raja exposes his subjects to disgrace, it is the certain token of the destruction of his country. Hence also it is, that none of the Malayan race ever engage in rebellion, or turn their faces from their own rajahs, even though their conduct be bad, and their proceedings tyrannical.”—Malàyan Annals.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 342.
[12] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Lord Minto, dated 4 May 1811. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. P. 38.
[13] “…native states, deprived of their fair share of commerce, abandoned all attempts and sunk into the comparative insignificance in which they were found at the period when our traders began to navigate those seas from Madras and Bengal. The destruction of the native trade of the archipelago by this withering policy, may be considered as the origin of many of the evils and of all the piracies of which we now complain. A maritime and commercial people, suddenly deprived of all honest employment or the means of respectable subsistence, either sunk into apathy and indolence, or expended their natural energies in piratical attempts to recover, by force and plunder, what they had been deprived of by policy and fraud. In this state of decay, they continued to degenerate, till the appearance of the British traders revived their suppressed and nearly extinguished energies, and awoke to new life the commerce and enterprise of this interesting portion of the globe.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[14] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 8.
[15] Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 108.
[16] “Black pepper, as among the Maláyus, is scarcely ever used, on account of its supposed heating quality. The most common seasoning employed to give a relish to their insipid food, is the lombok; triturated with salt, it is called sámbel, both by the Maláyus and Javans, and this condiment is indispensable and universal. It is of different kinds, according to the substances added to increase or diversify its strength or pungency; the most common addition is trási, denominated by the Maláyus, bláchang. The name lálab is given to various leaves and kernels, mostly eaten raw with rice and sámbel: many of these substances possess a pungency and odour intolerable to Europeans.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 108.
[17] “Maláyus, the sárong is either worn slung over the shoulders as a sash, or tucked round the waist and descending to the ankles, so as to enclose the legs like a petticoat. The patterns in use among the Maláyus or Búgis are universally Tartan; but besides these, the Javans pride themselves in a great variety of others, the common people only wearing the Tartan pattern, the crown of the head is covered with it, and the ends are tucked in” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. Pp. 96 -97
[18] Maláyus and Búgis, who always wear it (their hair) short. Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 99.
[19] “Quail-fighting (áduh gemár) and cock-fighting (áduh jágu) were formerly very prevalent, the latter particularly, among the common people, but by no means to the same extent as practised in the other islands of the Archipelago, in many parts of which, particularly among the Maláyus, it forms almost the whole source of diversion and interest. On the establishment of the British power, cock-fighting and gaming, which had formerly proved a productive source of revenue to the European government, were prohibited, and are now in consequence rarely resorted to. The Javans were not in the habit of fixing spurs to their cocks: this practice, they say, belongs to the Maláyus.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 390.
[20] “Although the Malayan camphor, which is the exclusive produce of Sumatra and Borneo, is much stronger than the camphor from China,” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 231.
[21] The Malays had goldsmiths is a signpost that the Malay States mined gold – They (Javana) do not, however, usually work the gold into those beautiful filigree patterns, described as common among the Maláyus on Sumatra, nor is their work generally so fine. Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 194.
According to Stamford Raffles, in the political institution of the Malay State of Johor, the most powerful individual is the Sultan and then the high officials,[1] however, they hold little value[2] to Stamford Raffles (1781–1826). When they submit to the will of the British only is the Sultan and his high officials considered competent.[3] Stamford Raffles (1781– 1826) considers the friendship and alliance of the Malay Rulers in Johor are important to the British.[4]
[1] Sultan Hussain, The Temenggung and Farquhar are the most powerful three people in Singapore as they grant permissions. M2: Singapore: Letters from Bengal to the Resident Page 177 of 407, 26 June 1819.
[2] The Temenggung of Johor is given $3000 Spanish Dollars per annum, a fair compensation for the sacrifice for his authority over the habour. Stamford Raffles. Journal Entry 30th January 1819. John Bastin. Letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles: The Tang Holdings Collection of autograph letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles. P. 154.
[3] “The Sultan of Johor and the Temenggung of Singapore, are competent to the conclusion of a treaty and the transfer to the British of ground sufficient for our Factories…” Letter from Stamford Raffles (1781 – 1826) to J. Adam, dated 13 February 1819. John Baston. Raffles and Hastings; Private Exchanges Behind the Founding of Singapore. Singapore: National Library Board. 2014. Pp. 68–69.
[4] M2: Singapore: Letters from Bengal to the Resident Page 11 of 407. Treaty of Friendship and Alliance concluded between the Honourable Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles Lieutenant Governor of Fort Marlborough and its Dependencies Agent of the most Noble Francis Marquis of Hastings Governor General of India for the Honourable East India Company on the one Part and their Highnesses Sultan Mohamed Shah Sultan of Johore and Dato Tumongong Sri Maharajah Abdol [Rahman] Chief of Singapore and its Dependencies on the other Part. Sourced from the National Archives Singapore. Date accessed 25 January 2024 https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/private_records/recorddetails/cf974fb9-e335-11e9-b18a-001a4a5ba61b
According to Stamford Raffles, each Malay State on the Malay Peninsula has their own Undang-undang, legal system,[1] with their own specialties.[2] There are three types[3] of legal institutions and they are derived from Malay manuscripts and churned into legal codes, therefore, the Malay laws and customs are older than the Malay nation[4]— laws instituted upon Islam, laws independent of Islam,[5] and laws where there are syncretised where the execution is dependent upon the religious scholar in authority and power.[6] Debt slavery is tolerated and acknowledged by Malay law.[7] However, in certain cases, it lacks in justice — therefore the Malays is always prepared to avenge.[8]
[1] “Of the Malay Peninsula, the principal states entitled to notice on the western side, are those of Kedeh, Maláca and Johór; and on the eastern, those of Tringáno, Patáni and Pahang. From these I have obtained and collected several copies of the Undang Undang Kedeh, the Undang Un- dang Maláca, and the Undang Undang Johor. The states on the eastern side of the peninsula, with the exception of Patáni, which has been con- siderably influenced by the Siamese, seem generally to have admitted the superiority of the Malay government, first established at Sín hapúra, and afterwards at Johor.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.106.
[2] “The Maláca code stated to have been compiled during the reign of Sultan Muhammed Shah, of which I (Stamford Raffles 1781–1826) have three copies, treats principally of commercial and maritime usages, and in these branches may form the text of a Digest of the Malay Laws; whilst the institutions of Johor, from the intimate connection which appears always to have existed between Malaca and the southern part of the peninsula, may be useful as a supplement on these points; at the same time that it will branch out into civil and criminal law generally, and the general principles of communication between the different states. The Kedeh code may in like manner form the text for such parts of the Institutions as may be most applicable to the intercourse of Europeans, and tend best to a general understanding of the character and usages of the Malay countries in the immediate vicinity of the British settlements. This state, until the establishment of the English at Pulau Pinang, possessed a respectable commerce, and still retains its Malayan government and institutions applicable to internal affairs; though reduced in external importance, The institutions of the smaller states, as of Salingór, Perak and others, may only require notice as far as they differ from the general code of the superior states.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P.107.
[3] Malay laws – not all islands adopt the Mahomedan Law, some adopt but not to the full extent and some absorb the Mahomedan law and blend it with their original customs and institutions. Stamford Raffles. “Minute on the Singapore Institution.” 1823. P. 19. Sourced from the National Archives of Malaysia, ascension number 2006/0007837.
[4] “The laws and customs of the Malays, may be considered, either separately, or as they have reference to those of the more ancient and original inhabitants of the eastern islands, with whom they are now so intimately connected. What may be termed, the proper laws and customs of the Malayu nation, as it at present exists, will first be adverted to.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 104.
[5] Among the laws that is purely Malay is the power and authority vested in the Nakhoda – “The power of life and death vested in the Nakhodah may be considered as purely Malay.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 128.
[6] “Some difficulty appears to have occurred in adapting these institutions to the general tenor of the Mahometan law, and many anomalous ones appear accordingly to have sprung up in different states. These occur in every part of jurisprudence, whether commercial, civil, or criminal, and are recited in the Undang úndang and Adat Maláyu, which are the systems of national law among the Maláyus. They vary considerably from each other in different states, and still more from the generally acknowledged principle of Mahometan law, as received by the Arabs. Hence there is, in almost every state, a constant struggle between the adherents of the old Malayan usages and the Hájis, together with other religious persons, who are desirous of introducing the laws of the Arabs, in order to increase their own importance.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 261. There are two types of legal institutions for the Malays; the independent from Islam and dependent upon Islam where their practices is dependent upon the local Arabian and Mahomedan teachers. “Independent of the laws of the Koran, which are more or less observed in the various Malay states, according to the influence of their Arabian and Muhammedan teachers, but seldom, further than they affect matters of on Qran religion, marriage and inheritance; the Malay states possess several codes of laws denominated Undang Undang, or Institutions, of different antiquity and authority, compiled by their respective, sovereigns: and every state of any extent possesses its own Undang Undang. Throughout the whole, there appears a general accordance, and where they differ it is seldom be- yond what situation, superior advantages, and authority have naturally dic- tated. Many of the Undang Undang, contain the mere regulations for the collection of the duties for trade, and the peculiar observations of the port, while others ascend to the higher branches of civil and criminal law.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 104.
[7] Stamford Raffles. “Minute on the Singapore Institution.” 1823. P. 18. Sourced from the National Archives of Malaysia, ascension number 2006/0007837
[8] “In these countries, where there is very little justice to be obtained from regularly established courts, and where an individual considers himself justified in taking the law into his own hands accordingly, the Maláyu is always prepared to avenge with his krís the slightest insult on the spot; but the knowledge that such an immediate appeal is always at hand, prevents the necessity of its often being resorted to, an habitual politeness ensues, and it has often been said, that if the Maláyus are savages, they are by far the most polite savages that we know of. If this effect is produced on the wilder and less civilized Maláyu, and has equal force with the more adventurous and warm-hearted Búgis, it may be easily conceived the Javans have not escaped it.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 393.
According to Stamford Raffles, in the ancient Malay culture, piracy was an honourable occupation.[1] However, they slowly outgrew that occupation into becoming maritime and commercial people[2] but reverted back to their old ways due to the oppression by the Dutch.[3] Inherited from the Dutch was the monopoly of trade by the Malay rajas.[4] Apart from piracy, the economy of the Malays was generated through trade[5] and high-skilled labour; goldsmith.[6]
[1] The prevalence of piracy on the Malayan coasts, and the light in which it was viewed as an honourable occupation, worthy of being followed by young princes and nobles, is an evil of ancient date, and intimately connected with the Malayan habits. The old Malayan romances, and the fragments of their traditional history, constantly refer with pride to piratical cruises.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 259.
[2] The identity of the Malay people are being maritime and commercial people prior to the coming of the Dutch, the Dutch destroyed their identity through oppression. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[3] The Malays became pirates, apathetic, indolent out of desperation from the oppression from the Dutch. “…native states, deprived of their fair share of commerce, abandoned all attempts and sunk into the comparative insignificance in which they were found at the period when our traders began to navigate those seas from Madras and Bengal. The destruction of the native trade of the archipelago by this withering policy, may be considered as the origin of many of the evils and of all the piracies of which we now complain. A maritime and commercial people, suddenly deprived of all honest employment or the means of respectable subsistence, either sunk into apathy and indolence, or expended their natural energies in piratical attempts to recover, by force and plunder, what they had been deprived of by policy and fraud. In this state of decay, they continued to degenerate, till the appearance of the British traders revived their suppressed and nearly extinguished energies, and awoke to new life the commerce and enterprise of this interesting portion of the globe.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[4] “A circumstance highly injurious to the commerce of the Malayan nations is the trading monopoly, which in most of the Malayan ports is actually assumed by the chiefs. Of this monopoly there is no trace in the Undang úndang of the Maláyus, or in the fragments of their history which have yet come to light, and it is a question whether this pernicious practice has not been copied from the monopoly regulations of the Dutch.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. P. 262.
[5] “In August, 1731, another contract was entered into with the sultan, of which the following were the most interesting articles.That all Búgis, Maláyus, Javans, and other native traders, shall be allowed freely to dispose of their wares at Bantam, without any interference on the part of the Dutch Resident, provided they do not trade in articles which constitute the Company’s monopoly. The subjects of Bantam shall be permitted to trade to Java on condition that they do not abuse the confidence thus placed in them by engaging in illicit commerce. The sultan promised to adopt immediate measures for increasing the annual deliveries of pepper to the Company, and engaged to hold out every possible inducement to the Lámpung people to extend the cultivation of the article, instead of depressing them by unnecessary acts of severity. A deed was also executed about this time ceding Púlo Pánjang to the Dutch, for the purpose of keeping an establishment on it for assisting vessels in distress.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. 224.
[6] The Malays had goldsmiths – They (Javana) do not, however, usually work the gold into those beautiful filigree patterns, described as common among the Maláyus on Sumatra, nor is their work generally so fine. Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 1. 1823. P. 194.
According to Stamford Raffles, the coming of the Europeans had impacted the Malays, the Portuguese broke the power of the native states, the Dutch[1] brought trauma and degenerated the Malays and the British restored the dignity of the Malays.[2] The antidote to the decay of the Malay nation brought by Islam is Christianity[3] to which the British are able to provide as through frequent exposure to the Malays, the British has enjoyed a sense of congeniality towards the Malays.[4]
[1] The Malays became pirates, apathetic, indolent out of desperation from the oppression from the Dutch “…native states, deprived of their fair share of commerce, abandoned all attempts and sunk into the comparative insignificance in which they were found at the period when our traders began to navigate those seas from Madras and Bengal. The destruction of the native trade of the archipelago by this withering policy, may be considered as the origin of many of the evils and of all the piracies of which we now complain. A maritime and commercial people, suddenly deprived of all honest employment or the means of respectable subsistence, either sunk into apathy and indolence, or expended their natural energies in piratical attempts to recover, by force and plunder, what they had been deprived of by policy and fraud. In this state of decay, they continued to degenerate, till the appearance of the British traders revived their suppressed and nearly extinguished energies, and awoke to new life the commerce and enterprise of this interesting portion of the globe.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[2] “The valour of Portugal broke the power of the native states, and left them exposed to the more selfish policy of their successors. The Dutch had no sooner established their capital at Batavia than, not satisfied with transferring to it the emporium of Bautain, they conceived the idea of making it the sole and only de- pot of the commerce of the archipelago. Had this object been combined with a liberal policy, and had the local circumstances of Batavia not ob- structed it, the effect might have been different and, instead of the ruin and desolation which ensued throughout a large portion of these islands, they might have advanced in civilization while they contributed to raise the prosperity and support the ascendancy of the Dutch metropolis. But when we advert to the greedy policy which swallowed up the resources of this extensive archipelago in a narrow and rigid monopoly, and that, instead of leaving trade to accumulate, as it had previously done at the natural emporia, it was forced by means of arbitrary and restrictive regu- lations into one which, independent of other disadvantages, soon proved the grave of the majority of those who were obliged to resort to it, we shall find the cause which made it as ruinous to the Dutch as to the peo- ple. By attempting too much, they lost what, under other circumstances might have been turned to advantage; and the native states, deprived of their fair share of commerce, abandoned all attempts and sunk into the comparative insignificance in which they were found at the period when our traders began to navigate those seas from Madras and Bengal. The destruction of the native trade of the archipelago by this withering policy, may be considered as the origin of many of the evils and of all the piracies of which we now complain. A maritime and commercial people, suddenly deprived of all honest employment or the means of respectable subsistence, either sunk into apathy and indolence, or expended their natural energies in piratical attempts to recover, by force and plunder, what they had been deprived of by policy and fraud. In this state of decay, they continued to degenerate, till the appearance of the British traders revived their suppressed and nearly extinguished energies, and awoke to new life the commerce and enterprise of this interesting portion of the globe.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. Pp. 6–7. The British will restore the dignity and original character of the Malays – When these striking and important differences are taken into the account, we may be permitted to indulge more sanguine expectations of improvement among the tribes of the eastern isles. We may look forward to an early abolition of piracy and illicit traffic when the seas shall be open to the free current of commerce. Restriction and oppression have too often converted their shores to scenes of rapine and violence, but an opposite policy and more enlightened principles may, ere long, subdue and remove the evil. In the spirit of personal independence which distinguishes these people, their high sense of honour, and the habits of reasoning and reflection to which they are accustomed from their infancy, are to be found the rudiments of improvement, and the basis on which a better order of society may be established. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 9.
[3] The Malays need Christianity as an antidote to Islam. “We thus see one of the finest Islands in the World, in which we have had establishments for upwards of a Century without once venturing to improve the Condition of the People or to send one Christian Missionary among them – giving way before the desolating influence of the false Prophet of Mecca, and becoming rapidly a strong Mahometan resting ground, with our eyes open, and with scarcely one effort made by ourselves to oppose them by a purer faith – The Missionaries we have lately employed in Sumatra are too few in number to do much, that they will do good as far as their influence reaches there can be no doubt, but that influence will long be limited to our own immediate Stations unless we encrease their numbers instead of three Missionaries, we ought to have three hundred, and the object of these three hundred should in the first place be to initiate three thousand of the natives to act as Missionaries in the interior – There are yet hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions in Sumatra who at this moment possess no religion at all among these we may include the Battas – The Padries are now on their very borders with the Koran in one hand and the Sword in the other and the only Missionary we have is an isolated Individual residing under the protection of the British factory at Tappanooly, but who has not the means of penetrating into the interior – This individual however (Mr. Burton) has translated part of the Scriptures into the Batta Language, and his success in this respect is highly praise worthy to his application & character – but alone, he can do little beyond the influence of our own factory which does not extend one mile inland”.” John Bastin. Letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles: The Tang Holdings Collection of autograph letters and books of Sir Stamford Raffles and Lady Raffles. P. 155.
[4] “The more the British is exposed to the Malays, the more congenial he feels – the general feeling which exists towards them on the part of every Englishman who has since been among them and become more intimately acquainted with their character, notwithstanding their piracies and the vices usually attributed to them in their present state, there is something in the Malayan character which is congenial to British minds, and which leaves an impression very opposite to that which a much longer intercourse has given of the more subdued and cultivated natives of Hindostan.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 10.
Analysis of the Malay Colonial Identity of Raffles
This section analyses Raffles portrayals of the Malays within the broader context of British colonial thought, personal experience, and historical circumstance.
The Malays were living a wretched life — both internally and externally. Islam brought spiritual oppression and regress in intellectual thinking despite having their own written legal institution and the Dutch brought economic oppression. Islam was the cause of the Malay experiencing their own Middle Ages, and the Dutch was the reason the Malays became pirates. Therefore, the Malays needed an impactful assistance and spiritual Renaissance to become dignified again, where only the British was capable of restoring their dignity in being Malays, by becoming Christians under the ambit of the administration of the British.
It is discovered that Stamford Raffles is not objective in his imagery of the Malays as he mostly does not adhere to the standards of objectivity. Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) had penned the images the Malays in a negative light. Upon conducting research with the employment of methodologies of historical and textual studies, it has been discovered that he had portrayed the Malays in his professional writing as incompetent people in need of the British to civilise and give progression to them and in their personal correspondence, the Malays are written as an inferior race.
Their main contention brought by them is that Islam had brought regression and the notion of anti-knowledge amongst the Malays with their Malay Chiefs being incompetent.[1] The intellectual scholarships of the Malays remain mum and muted to them and they are labelled stupid because the Malays upheld the Muslim worldview, therefore, they are harder to be manipulated and controlled, narrowing down the British desire to obtain wealth from the human resources of the Malays. They too abhor the Malay political institution spearheaded by the Malay Sultan of each monarchy with the advice of the Muslim Imams, scholars of Islam, as they protect the Malays from proselytizing efforts, therefore abandoning the hopes of converting the Malays on the Malay States of the Malay Peninsular from converting to Christianity, where Christianity remains another form of religious and worldview colonialism. During the Age of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) the British Empire was in need of food security and manufacturing and accumulation of lands, natural resources, and wealth for the purposes of the English’s self-preservation. He consistently casted doubt upon the literature, history and origin of the Malay people, stating that they migrated either from India[2] or Yunnan, China, which is a reflection of the Anglo-Saxons who originated from German and migrated to England,[3] thus creating a new race and nation for themselves, the English race and the country of England. Stamford Raffles preferred pre-Islamic Malay faiths due to the caste system brought by the Hindus, but he failed to mention that the Malays on the Malay Peninsula were mostly Buddhist, monotheistic, polytheist and animistic, who did not have social caste, unless between the Royals and non-Royals. Though they mostly mingled with the ruling class of the Malays, they had also viewed the Malays like a spectacle of theatre, employing empiricism as if the lives of the Malays were akin to actors on the stage of tragedy. The spectator functions as an untrained critic of theatre, just as they did.
His imagery of the Malay people is written best suited in accordance to his agenda of British settlement, interference, and penetration. Compounded with his own personal agenda to obtain power and create wealth and legacy for themselves. Their personal agenda anchored them through their careers and it was their Western Graeco-Roman worldview specifically of Moral philosophy in Western thought which gave interpretation to their surroundings. For the Western civilisation, the purpose of seeking knowledge is to produce in the seeker a good citizen.[4] Stamford Raffles was a citizen who benefitted society through his professional position – an agent of colonialism.
The Graeco-Roman philosophical tradition, centred on the notion of the “Other” and inferiority, informs the moral frameworks that align with Western modernity.
Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) applied Utilitarianism in preferring the pre-Islamic social caste compared to the then Islamic society and social hierarchy as it would make his governance more effective for the British Empire, whom was perceived as the good people of Christian faith in contrast to the Malays and others as heathens. He had the intention to make Singapore the British Isles in the East and justified this by stating it would a strategic British post for trade and commerce. He wrote denigrations of the Malays for he believed it was the British who were chosen to bring civilisation to the East through missionaries and administration therefore benefitting the Malays while simultaneously to bring the British better happiness in terms of natural and financial resources. He applied the core principle of Utilitarianism which is to bring happiness to the majority.
It is thus evident that Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) had written his Malay Images in alignment to his need for British penetration to which he had disguised as bringing goodness to the Malays and the British, — the common Malays would achieve social justice and progress while the British would obtain natural resources and cheap labour from the Malay States. The Malay ruling class would be subdued from committing abuse and cruelty to the subjugated class while they would serve the British Empire on cheap wages or given a small pension to give up their hereditary rights to rule the Malay States.
Showcasing that Stamford Raffles viewed himself highly leading to megalothymia which is a form of superiority complex. His constitution is an exhibition of their arrogance to which leads to their way of thinking that they are better than others therefore it is the White men’s burden to bring gospel and progress to the world. His notion of secularity has also caused this was of thinking, as he is disenchanted from nature and metaphysical thinking, he deemed himself liberated, therefore must liberate others from the clutches of primitiveness. The Europeans firstly came to the East for Commerce then missionary purposes. Then it led to capitalism and the want to dominate trade routes and the entitlement to obtain natural resources from others. First, they came to trade, mingled with the people and insinuated wars, by divide and conquer methodology. They then installed puppet leaders and punished those who rebelled against them. Then they took a subtle approach of controlling education, revenue distribution, and spread their propaganda through education and policies. Therefore, the images of the Malays written in the writings of Stamford Raffles are veneers of historical scholarship, yet below the superficiality, it a political propaganda. Therefore, the Malay Images in the writings of Stamford Raffles is his daydreams.[5]
The Malay images that adhere to the Malay reality is that the political institution of the Malays is the Malay Monarchy and the Malays have the special characteristic of amuk. Stamford Raffles’ methodology of empiricism has brought upon misinterpretation as they interpreted in accordance to their worldview, colonial understanding, Eurocentric approach, their own temperance, morality, personal and professional agendas, and their lack of objectivity.
[1] “Western scholarship engaged in Nusantara History has neglected and minimized the importance of the study Islam here. Prejudice against and fear of Islam have influenced Western Imperialism in attempting a consistent policy of separating Muslims from their religion, as has been the case with the Dutch and British powers in Nusantara.” Tatiana A. Denisova. Sumber Historiografi Alam Melayu. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: The National Library of Malaysia, 2020. P. 289. Taken from Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. “Islamic Culture in Malaysia” (Pp. 123–30) P. 129.
[2] The Greater India Theory is the opinion that the Malay Archipelago and most of Southeast Asia came from India and influenced all aspects of life of the people in Southeast Asia.
[3] F. M. Stenton. Anglo–Saxon England. Second edition. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press. 1947. Pp. 1–5. First published in 1943.
[4] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al- Attas. Islam: The Concept of Religion and the Foundation of Ethics and Morality. IBFIM: Kuala Lumpur. 2013. First published in 1976 by ABIM. P. 35.
[5] “Since satisfaction that is brought about by reason and its limitations is here aligned with a concept of knowledge, it is implied that the purpose of knowledge is pragmatic which, in a sense is true. But not all knowledge is problem solving. It may mean the resolution of doubtful situations on purely theoretical levels. Purely theoretical knowledge, that is, speculative knowledge, is not knowledge which is merely speculative, for the latter kind of ‘knowledge’ is just ideas and no more; they serve no theoretical context, no intellectual panorama or scientific vision, no operational plans to guide future action, and they are no better then daydreams.” Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, Concluding Postscript. P. 55.
The Criteria of Evaluation of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826)
This section analyses Raffles criteria of evaluation of the Malays within the broader context of British colonial thought, personal experience, and historical circumstance.
It has been analysed that Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) gave focus to the origins of the Malays, their social practices, cultural traits, and evolution through the British. The identity of the Malays through the aspects of ethnic, national, cultural and religious including historical development of Malay kingdoms is evaluated; however, the agrarian Malays are neglected; syncretism of laws dependent and independent of Islam is not given emphasis; and pre-Islamic history that is glorified by Stamford Raffles is only written in a glance.
In the classification of social, the evaluated elements are civilization, social class, legal institution, written language and literature, religious influences, practices of cultural and economic. What is not evaluated is the complexity of the Malay civilization and the pre-Islamic glimmer of cultural practices.
In the classification of political institutions, the Malays are evaluated by Stamford Raffles by its political structure. What is not given any evaluation is Malay political thought and the autonomy and agency of the Sultans of the Malay States.
In the economic sector, the Malays are evaluated by how they make revenue, their economic activity and the influence of European powers towards their way of making a living. The agrarian economy is omitted and not discussed.
Towards the end of the evaluation, the significance of the British in the betterment of the Malays are given emphasis in evaluation. However, the evils of colonialism by the British are not discussed, however, Stamford Raffles gives emphasis on the negative impact of the oppression of the Dutch towards the Malays, specifically their economic activities.
In conclusion, Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) was evaluating the Malays based upon the approach of better and effective governance. Stamford Raffles gives emphasis on how the Malays are not the original inhabitants of the Eastern Isles, rather being the earliest settlers from the Tartarian people, the Malay States and its people thrived under pre-Islamic faiths, yet is distinguished through Islam the impact of foreign influence that is forcefully and hurtful towards the Malays, for example, the Arabs brought Islam and regress, the Malays in turn became degenerates and missionaries for Islam in the Eastern Isles. Therefore, the Malays are weak internally because Islam, as a culture made them weaklings in addition to the external forces of the Dutch who had oppressed them and exploited them and caused them to sink into poverty and crime, where they pirate for a little money. The Malay Sultans are under immense pressure and their subjects regress in life. However, the impact of the Dutch could be diminished with the presence and powers of the British, while the antidote to Islam is Christianity, where it would rebuild their character and generate them into dignified beings. The Malays are evaluated upon the motivations of Stamford Raffles to govern them through the East India Company, a new government of the making of rich people of England, who do not have the power to rule on the throne of England because of their lacking in Royal birthrights and heir to the throne.
It has been analysed that Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) gave focus to the origins of the Malays, their social practices, cultural traits, and evolution through the British. The identity of the Malays through the aspects of ethnic, national, cultural and religious including historical development of Malay kingdoms is evaluated; however, the agrarian Malays are neglected; syncretism of laws dependent and independent of Islam is not given emphasis; and pre-Islamic history that is glorified by Stamford Raffles is only written in a glance.
In the classification of social, the evaluated elements are civilization, social class, legal institution, written language and literature, religious influences, practices of cultural and economic. What is not evaluated is the complexity of the Malay civilization and the pre-Islamic glimmer of cultural practices.
In the classification of political institutions, the Malays are evaluated by Stamford Raffles by its political structure. What is not given any evaluation is Malay political thought and the autonomy and agency of the Sultans of the Malay States.
In the economic sector, the Malays are evaluated by how they make revenue, their economic activity and the influence of European powers towards their way of making a living. The agrarian economy is omitted and not discussed.
Towards the end of the evaluation, the significance of the British in the betterment of the Malays are given emphasis in evaluation. However, the evils of colonialism by the British are not discussed, however, Stamford Raffles gives emphasis on the negative impact of the oppression of the Dutch towards the Malays, specifically their economic activities.
In conclusion, Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) was evaluating the Malays based upon the approach of better and effective governance. Stamford Raffles gives emphasis on how the Malays are not the original inhabitants of the Eastern Isles, rather being the earliest settlers from the Tartarian people, the Malay States and its people thrived under pre-Islamic faiths, yet is distinguished through Islam the impact of foreign influence that is forcefully and hurtful towards the Malays, for example, the Arabs brought Islam and regress, the Malays in turn became degenerates and missionaries for Islam in the Eastern Isles. Therefore, the Malays are weak internally because Islam, as a culture made them weaklings in addition to the external forces of the Dutch who had oppressed them and exploited them and caused them to sink into poverty and crime, where they pirate for a little money. The Malay Sultans are under immense pressure and their subjects regress in life. However, the impact of the Dutch could be diminished with the presence and powers of the British, while the antidote to Islam is Christianity, where it would rebuild their character and generate them into dignified beings. The Malays are evaluated upon the motivations of Stamford Raffles to govern them through the East India Company, a new government of the making of rich people of England, who do not have the power to rule on the throne of England because of their lacking in Royal birthrights and heir to the throne.
Stamford Raffles had his emphasis in evaluation and the Malays are mostly not given a full evaluation as a people and culture. He evaluates in accordance to their needs, being commerce, effective administration and penetration of Christianity, and adoption of British culture to combat bad character, attain progress and increase revenue. It has been analysed that he evaluates the Malays based upon their willingness to accept British intervention in the Malay States on the Malay Peninsula. He projected his own insecurities upon the Malay people, for example, portraying the Malays to be settlers and evil towards the indigenous people just like them who are settlers on the England, and wicked to the indigenous people of Great Britain, the Welsh, Irish, and Scots. His inferiority complex was disguised as superiority complex.
With regards to slavery, an institution ingrained in the Malay culture since immemorial; debt-slavery is given emphasis as it is the peculiarity of the Malay people. However, this is considered an evil are the creditor are commonly exploitive and abusive in all perspectives. Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) tried to abolish debt-slavery and replace it with indentured labour, showcasing their reason and morality for every individual to be free and not treated as property.
Emphasis is given mainly to the negative characters of the Malays; for Stamford Raffles the evil character of the Malays are resulted from oppression of the Dutch and Islam. This exhibits his inner thoughts that those who are not Christians are evil and only Jesus Christ is the Lord and Saviour to mankind. Yet, his explanations are marred with capitalism tendencies showcased by how they revel in the natural resources found in the Malay peninsula and in the abundance of edible natural resources which is lacking in Britain. He has exhibited biased views in favour the British agenda and propagation, they have committed the logical fallacy of overgeneralisation and his writings and thoughts are a highly subjective perception to which those Malays, and their elements of evaluation that aligns with the British are written in a positive light and vice versa. The Malay colonial identity of the colonial officials differ from how the Malays identify themselves.
According to native sources, here Dato’ Onn states that the Malays are Muslim, speak the Malay language, and follow the customs of the Malays. Tanah Melayu is where Bahasa Melayu is predominantly spoken. The (refined) Malay language defines the people of Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines, the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia. Good character and equity (fairness – fair share is whatever is afforded and good education system) is what defines the Malay. When the Malay speaks, he speaks the truth, when he makes a promise, he fulfils it, when he is given a trust, he fulfils it.
The British make noble the Malay Language, the preserved the Malay language by writing dictionaries. However, the Melayu Baru are those who equate Malays to Islam and Islam to Melayu. The Melayu Baru are the ones diminishing the Malay language. Money is what defines the Melayu Baru, they want to create wealth for themselves and not others.[1]
According to Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas (1931–), the Malays are derived from a people who inhibited Jambi, Sumatera.[2] Their lives prior to Islam was stark in contrast to when they were Muslims. The faiths of the Malays before the coming of Islam was a mixture of Hinduism, Buddhism, and local faiths[3] where only the aristocrats who earnestly subscribed to Hinduism and only gave importance to rituals were the aristocrats were the incarnation of the gods and goddesses therefore cementing their elite status amongst the people.[4] The pre-Islamic Malays leaned towards artistic characteristic compared to philosophical;[5] signified by the lacking of a known Malay-Hindu neither Malay-Bhuda intellect or philosopher.[6] The language of the Pre-Islamic Malays were filled with superstition.[7]
To combat Islam, the Western scholars of Oriental Studies exalted the Javanese civilization,[8] and there is a theory that Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism came from India to the Malay World which give prominence to the Indian continent and culture.[9]
Islam is a watershed event that had moved the Malays to create the Malay language, as vehicle of Islam[10] as the Malay civilization is a Muslim civilization;[11] while “Western culture reflects shirk as opposed to tawhid.”[12] The coming of Islam was by the trade routes but not by the traders as Islam came to the Malay Archipelago through propagation by authoritative missionaries.[13] Consequently, Malacca, Acheh and Pasai took the role of disseminating Islam in the Malay World.[14] Islam blew a new spirit into the Malay World and changed life for the better.[15] Islam brought rationalism and intellectualism to the Malays of nobility and commoners.[16] It is so beloved that the Malays recite the Quran before learning the Malay language.[17]
The political institution of the Malays are the monarchy and they have their own customs in succession of the throne[18] exemplified by “… the Malacca of Raja Iskandar, where the traditional customs and institutions of the Malays and their rulers became truly established.”[19] Economic activities were trade based as the Malays are a trade society.[20] The people of the Malay identity was not divided by regionalism as regionalism originated in the West.[21]
It was Islam that perfected the Malays in the sense of individuality and nationhood, language of unity of literature and religion.[22] The grammar of a language is an ontology for culture and the diction shapes the concepts in the ontology.[23] The Malay language in the Jawi alphabet is a vehicle for Islam.[24]
Literature is a reflection of a civilization, which is the intellectual existence.[25] Hamzah Fansuri is the originator of the Malay shai’ir[26] not Abdullah Munshi who took the Sejarah Melayu as his guide to writing, to which is written in the older Malay Court language prior to the coming of Islam, to which this older language streams the folktales, romance, epic and historical fiction which reflects the old Malay worldview of Animisme-HinduBuddha.[27] Hamzah Fansuri is the father of modern Malay literature as he was the first to utilize the Malany Language with rationality and systematic, with an intellect that encompasses a pure mind of language that dives into the sea of philosophy.[28]
The root cause of negative images of the Malay people within Oriental Studies based on a worldview approach is the foundation of the Graeco-Roman worldview that views itself as superior to others. This notion is retained and added with an Eurocentrism approach in the scholarship of Oriental studies. Then further compounded with secularism in Oriental Studies where their, first, propagation of the Christian faith churned into creating their immortality through thrusting upon others their way of life. They are adamanent retain their timelessness and relevance and have the fear to be forgotten as when one is forgotten, they are no longer in power.
[1] “What’s going on Malaysia? Melayu and Melayu Baru.” & November 2021, 9 p.m. in an interview with Syed Ali al-Attas by Harith Iskandar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPXFKXFEgkw
[2] “The name ‘Malay’ or ‘Melayu’ is derived from the name of a people who inhabited an ancient state in Sumatra known to the Chinese in the mid-seventh century as ‘Mo-lo- yeou’ which was situated in Jambi on the southeastern coast of Sumatra. This ancient people spoke a relatively undeveloped language which was not Malay as we know it today, but which scholars refer to as ‘Old Malay’ which had no written form of its own.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xv.
[3] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 12. First published in 1972.
[4] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 12. First published in 1972.
[5] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 13. First published in 1972.
[6] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 13. First published in 1972.
[7] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 16. First published in 1972.
[8] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 26. First published in 1972.
[9] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). 1999. P. 33. First published in 1972.
[10] “This ancient people (Melayu) spoke a relatively undeveloped language which was not Malay as we know it today, but which scholars refer to as ‘Old Malay’ which had no written form of its own. The force that moved the genius of the Malay being to create their own new language by taking the best words from all the languages of the neighbourhood was the emergence of Islam from within that being. It was due to Islam also that the knowledge and use of this new Malay language, not only as a lingua franca for international trade and commerce, but more importantly as a literary and scientific language, spread to all parts of the Archipelago and gave this heterogeneous region not merely an outward aspect of unity, but more profoundly an inward unity of souls bound together in religion. In its written form, the new language is formulated and articulated in the Arabic script with five additional symbols to represent phonemes not found in Arabic. European scholars and historians have mistakenly called this script (i.e. Jawi) ‘Perso-Arabic’. I think the correct term to name the script is Malayo-Arabic. The cultural substratum of the Malay language in its spoken and written form is also Arabic and Islamic and not Sanskrit and Hindu-Buddhist. It was from the learned and scientific writings of Muslim and Malay thinkers and scholars of the 16th and 17th centuries that the modern Malay language is descended. The spread of the new and vibrant Malay language and literature as a vehicle of Islam and knowledge presently used by more than two hundred million people in the Malay Archipelago is one of the most important factors in the creation of nationhood, the other factor being the religion of Islam itself.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. Pp. xv–xvi.
[11] “Islamic civilization as a civilization that emerges among the diversity of cultures of Muslim peoples of the world as a result of the permeation of the basic elements of the religion of Islam which those peoples have caused to emerge from within themselves. The process by which such emergence comes about is called Islamization, which is the liberation first from magical, mythical, animistic and ethnic cultural tradition incompatible with Islam, and then from secular control over one’s reason and one’s language. Whatever basic and praiseworthy elements of the pre-Islamic civilization that bind people together and are accepted as compatible with Islam become part of Islamic civilization. It is a living civilization whose pulse describes a process of Islamization, not in the dialectical sense of an evolutionary ‘development’, but in the sense of a progress involving every generation of Muslims towards realization of the original nature and spirit of Islam as something already established in history; in the sense of an unfolding of the theoretical and practical principles of Islam in the life of the people; in the sense of an actualization of the essentials and potentials of Islam in the realms of existence. This progress, unfolding, and actualization depend upon the levels of knowledge of Islam, of intellectual and cultural attainment of the peoples in which the progress, unfolding and actualization occur. Islamic civilization is therefore a manifestation of unity in diversity as well as of diversity in unity. In terms of cultural history Malay civilization is an Islamic civilization.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xv.
[12] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Concluding Postscript to the Origin of the Malay Sha‘ir. P. 51.
[13] “…its (Islam) emergence in the Malay Archipelago came about through propagation by authoritative missionaries, understandably slow at first at the end of the 7th century and increasing in momentum by the 12th to the 16th centuries continuing to the present day.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xvii.
[14] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 22.
[15] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 19.
[16] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 20.
[17] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 63.
[18] “According to the Malay custom of succession, only when the king’s older son by his wife married and had a son, presenting the king with a grandson, would that son succeed him as king.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. 31.
[19] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P.66
[20] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 37.
[21] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 58
[22] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Pp. 56–57.
[23] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 39.
[24] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Pp. 42–43.
[25] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu P. 65.
[26] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. The Origin of the Malay Sha‘ir. Kuala Lumpur: Ta’dib International. 2018. P. 1.
[27] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 46.
[28] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Pp. 46–47.
European historiography & Criterion of Objectivity
The chapter will explore key elements of European historiography to frame the works of these colonial officials, subsequently, an analysis of their writings will follow, highlighting their exhibition of objectivity.
European cultural tradition is rooted in feudal, monarchical, and aristocratic structures, where individual acts of boldness, violence, and risk are often central themes, frequently culminating in tragedy.
The four key elements define European historiography; monarchy, partisanship, homogeneous representation, and the two types of historical interpretations- racial and Marxist. Ultimately, historiography demands careful, critical engagement with sources to ensure conclusions are well-supported by probability and evidence.
In the writings of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) the first element of European historiography is the monarchy,[1] is the unifying factor for the British and Malays. This is exhibited when he writes of the Royal Family of Johor.
[1] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 177
The second element of European historiography of partisanship[1] is written from a Christian point of view as exhibited when he states the Malays are regressed because of Islam. This probably stems from the enmity between Christians and Muslims.
[1] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 178.
The fourth element of European historiography is racial biasness[1] which is a constant theme and undertone in the writings of Stamford Raffles towards the Malays are exhibited; for example when he wrote that the Malay Cycle (calendar) is adopted from the Siamese,[2] The Malay language, literature, popular narratives are adopted from India;[3]The Malays are inferior because they are not the original stock of the Eastern Isles and that Islam brought the, regress; prior to the coming on Islam, they were dependent on the Siamese for their written language;[4] The pre-Islamic Malays were wild — the Malays had their own wild traditions prior to the coming of Islam;[5] there is a probability that Maláyus had derived their names from a character Si Maláyu, which means a wanderer, in a dramatic performance of the people of Borneo.[6]
[1] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 181
[2] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Philip Dundas, dated 6 July 1806. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. Pp. 9–12.
[3] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Philip Dundas, dated 6 July 1806. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. Pp. 9–12.
[4] Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 126
[5] “He (John Leyden) was aware that in these islands, as well as on the continent of India, the commencement of authentic history was only [found] to be dated from the introduction of Mahometanism but in the wild traditions of the Malays, he thought, he sometimes discovered a glimmering of light, which might perhaps serve to illustrate an earlier period. These glimmerings, he was accustomed to say, were very faint but, in the absence of all other lights, they were worth pursuing; they would, at all events, account for and explain many of the peculiar institutions and customs of the people, and serve to make his countrymen better acquainted with a race who ap- peared to him to possess the greatest claims on their consideration and attention.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 5.
[6] “In the dramatic performances of the Bálians, Klána Tánjung Púra is the same with Si Maláyu, which means a wanderer, and from which it has been supposed probable that the Maláyus have derived their name.” Stamford Raffles. The History of Java. Vol. 2. P. 96.
Criterion of Objectivity
This chapter shall analyse the standards of objectivity as according to the parameter given by Jacques Barzum in his The Modern Researcher. The standards required to achieve the criterion of objectivity are (1) accuracy, (2) a commitment to order, (3) logic,(4) honesty, (5) self-awareness, (6) imagination, (7) unity and completeness, (8) is not bias, (9) does not generalise from a single instance or commits to Reductive Fallacy, (10) does not apply misplaced Literalism, (11) employs the precise choice of words that bring clarity in meaning, (12) avoids poor judgement,(13) does not contain vulgarity, and (14) does not use the tone of perpetual timidity and indecision.
Objectivity is essential to prevent history from becoming propaganda as facts are rarely pure and are often shaped by interpretation. Propaganda exploits the tendency to accept meaning without analysis, therefore, it is incumbent for the historian to critically assess language to resist manipulation and avoid uncritical acceptance of written narratives. Knowing their criterion of objectivity is essential in determining the elements of credibility and truthfulness in their Malay colonial identity written in their corpus. This is a crucial step to bringing the Malay colonial identity to the direction of truthfulness.
The first standard of objectivity is accuracy[1] in the writings of Stamford Raffles (1781–1826), his analysis was from his experience and his study of the Malay codes and other manuscripts. However, he interprets events in accordance to Eurocentrism and the colonial worldview.
[1] Accuracy is the facts are ascertain. Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. 1962. P. 57.
The second standard of objectivity is a commitment to order,[1] to which is evident in the writings of Stamford Raffles, specifically in his On the Maritime Nations.
[1] Love for order is that the value of the system keeps the order, which involves three minor virtues calm, patience, and pertinacity. Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. 1962. Pp. 57–58.
The third standard of objectivity is logic;[1] Stamford Raffles had written the Malays regressed due to Islam, while he acknowledges the legislations of the Malay people; showing a contradiction in thought process.
[1] Logic are of two types, mechanical and intellectual. Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. 1962. P. 58.
The fifth standard of objectivity is self-awareness,[1] Stamford Raffles is indeed in control of his emotions when writing in treatment of the Malays.
[1] “The researcher must have self-awareness in his research where his emotions are to be controlled and he must set the criteria when passing judgement, hence, he must be honest and make his criteria of evaluation clear to the readers” & “There are two important realms where self-awareness is absolutely crucial, when giving the description of cultures alien in time or space, and biography.” Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. 1962. P. 59.
The sixth standard of objectivity is imagination,[1] to which Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) displayed through his writings as he had an abundance of Malay manuscripts at his disposal and still sought them.
[1] The researcher must be able to imagine where to retain his sources and what type of sources for his research. Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. Pp. 59–60
The eighth standard of objectivity is not bias;[1] to which was not adhered to in the writings of Stamford Raffles as he disliked the Dutch[2] and wrote the reputation of the unpleasant Malay character was given by the Dutch.[3]
[1] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 166.
[2] Stamford Raffles, Letter to Sultan of Palembang, dated 3rd March 1811. Ahmat Adam. Letters of Sincerity: The Raffles Collection of Malay Letters (1780-1824): A Descriptive Account with Notes and Translations. Kuala Lumpur: the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 2009. P. 365.
[3] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Lord Minto, dated 4 May 1811. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. P. 38.
The eleventh standard of objectivity is that Stamford Raffles employed the precise choice of words that bring clarity in meaning,[1] to which he met this standard of objectivity.
[1] The words are not to be misleading, there are not to mask or make attractive… “A historian pays attention to the language used as bad generalizations are often the result of careless language.” Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 125
The twelfth standard of objectivity is that Stamford Raffles (12) avoids poor judgement;[1] to which he failed to do so as he evaluated the Malays from perspective of governance and a Eurocentric and Christian worldview where they were regarded less than Christians.
[1] The historian is not to be engaging in poor reasoning… “History must be as precise as close research and guarded statement can make it, but it must not lose vividness and impetus, yet when overextended generalization does not come from the careless use of universals, it comes from the failure to think of negative instances.” Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. Pp. 125–126.
The thirteenth standard of objectivity is that the writings of Stamford Raffles does not contain vulgarity,[1] no levelling was detected in the selected writings employed in this thesis.
[1] The historian must avoid the fallacy of Vulgarity, distinctive characters should not be made lost. Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 129.
The fourteenth standard of objectivity is that Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) (14) does not use the tone of perpetual timidity and indecision.[1] There is contradiction evident in the writings, according to Stamford Raffles the Malays are native[2] to the Eastern Isles, yet their origins are unknown;[3] they are not the original stock[4] as they originated from Tartar.[5]
[1] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 126.
[2] Letter from Stamford Raffles to Lord Minto, dated 4 May 1811. Sophia Raffles. Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles. Introduction by John Bastin. P. 31.
[3] “Whatever may have been the origin of the Malayu nation, the primary population of these various and extensive islands, could never, according to any natural inference, have proceeded from the Malays, though the reverse may probably have been the case, whatever may have been borrowed from a more foreign source.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[4] “Whatever may have been the origin of the Malayu nation, the primary population of these various and extensive islands, could never, according to any natural inference, have proceeded from the Malays, though the reverse may probably have been the case, whatever may have been borrowed from a more foreign source.” Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. P. 103.
[5] “Retaining much of that boldness which marks the Tartar stock, from whence they are supposed to have sprung, they have acquired a softness, not less remarkable in their manners than in their language. Few people attend more to the courtesies of society.” Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 10.
The selected writings of Stamford Raffles do not meet most of the standards of objectivity, therefore, it leans to the direction of propaganda. The British government according to Stamford Raffles is “an enlightened and liberal government;”[1] in contradiction to the Dutch who are jealous of the British[2] with their oppression being the main external force for the degeneration of the Malays.[3] And the antidote for the malady of the Malays is Christianity and the defence against the oppression of the Dutch is British administration. This is a clear form of propaganda where there is an urgent need for the British Empire to assist the Malays to achieve liberty and better experience of life. tone of perpetual timidity and indecision.[4] He was certain and showed conviction in his writings.
Most of his writings does not meet the standards of objectivity and leans to the direction of propaganda. It can be analysed that he writes the Malays as bad character in need of guidance, weak leadership, and low revenue. All three problems could be remedied with the advice of the British, so the Malays may adopt the way of life of the British for better prosperity, effective leadership, which leads to better revenue of income.
[1] Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[2] Stamford Raffles. Statement of the Services of Sir Stamford Raffles with an Introduction by John Bastin. P. 40.
[3] The Malays became pirates, apathetic, indolent out of desperation from the oppression from the Dutch. Stamford Raffles. “Introduction.” Sejarah Melayu: The Malay Annals, trans. John Leyden. P. 7.
[4] Jacques Barzum and Henry F. Graff. The Modern Researcher. 1962. P. 126.
Stamford Raffles does not meet the full standards of objectivity as outlined by Jacques Barzum in his The Modern Researcher. Their writings are the colonial identity given to the Malays, based upon colonial prejudice, and Eurocentric approach.
It is not the worldview and temperance of the authors that gives effect to the truthfulness and credibility, rather it is their objectivity, and yet they fail in being objective. These Malay imageries in their writings are just propaganda to suit their readership and their agendas for British penetration.
This is not in tandem to how the Malays describe themselves.
According to native sources, here Dato’ Onn states that the Malays are Muslim, speak the Malay language, and follow the customs of the Malays. Tanah Melayu is where Bahasa Melayu is predominantly spoken. The (refined) Malay language defines the people of Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines, the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia. Good character and equity (fairness — fair share is whatever is afforded and good education system) is what defines the Malay. When the Malay speaks, he speaks the truth, when he makes a promise, he fulfils it, when he is given a trust, he fulfils it. The British make noble the Malay Language, the preserved the Malay language by writing dictionaries. However, the Melayu Baru are those who equate Malays to Islam and Islam to Melayu. The Melayu Baru are the ones diminishing the Malay language. Money is what defines the Melayu Baru, they want to create wealth for themselves and not others.[1]
According to Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas (1931–), the Malays are derived from a people who inhibited Jambi, Sumatera.[2] Their lives prior to Islam was stark in contrast to when they were Muslims. The faiths of the Malays before the coming of Islam was a mixture of Hinduism, Buddhism, and local faiths[3] where only the aristocrats who earnestly subscribed to Hinduism and only gave importance to rituals were the aristocrats were the incarnation of the gods and goddesses therefore cementing their elite status amongst the people.[4] The pre-Islamic Malays leaned towards artistic characteristic compared to philosophical;[5] signified by the lacking of a known Malay-Hindu neither Malay-Bhuda intellect or philosopher.[6] The language of the Pre-Islamic Malays were filled with superstition.[7] To combat Islam, the Western scholars of Oriental Studies exalted the Javanese civilization,[8] and there is a theory that Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism came from India to the Malay World which give prominence to the Indian continent and culture.[9]
Islam is a watershed event that had moved the Malays to create the Malay language, as vehicle of Islam[10] as the Malay civilization is a Muslim civilization;[11] while “Western culture reflects shirk as opposed to tawhid.”[12] The coming of Islam was by the trade routes but not by the traders as Islam came to the Malay Archipelago through propagation by authoritative missionaries.[13] Consequently, Malacca, Acheh and Pasai took the role of disseminating Islam in the Malay World.[14] Islam blew a new spirit into the Malay World and changed life for the better.[15] Islam brought rationalism and intellectualism to the Malays of nobility and commoners.[16] It is so beloved that the Malays recite the Quran before learning the Malay language.[17]
The political institution of the Malays is the monarchy and they have their own customs in succession of the throne[18] exemplified by “… the Malacca of Raja Iskandar, where the traditional customs and institutions of the Malays and their rulers became truly established.”[19] Economic activities were trade based as the Malays are a trade society.[20] The people of the Malay identity was not divided by regionalism as regionalism originated in the West.[21]
It was Islam that perfected the Malays in the sense of individuality and nationhood, language of unity of literature and religion.[22] The grammar of a language is an ontology for culture and the diction shapes the concepts in the ontology.[23] The Malay language in the Jawi alphabet is a vehicle for Islam.[24] Literature is a reflection of a civilization, which is the intellectual existence.[25] Hamzah Fansuri is the originator of the Malay shai’ir[26] not Abdullah Munshi who took the Sejarah Melayu as his guide to writing, to which is written in the older Malay Court language prior to the coming of Islam, to which this older language streams the folktales, romance, epic and historical fiction which reflects the old Malay worldview of Animisme-HinduBuddha.[27] Hamzah Fansuri is the father of modern Malay literature as he was the first to utilize the Malany Language with rationality and systematic, with an intellect that encompasses a pure mind of language that dives into the sea of philosophy.[28]
[1] “What’s going on Malaysia? Melayu and Melayu Baru.” & November 2021, 9 p.m. in an interview with Syed Ali al-Attas by Harith Iskandar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPXFKXFEgkw
[2] “The name ‘Malay’ or ‘Melayu’ is derived from the name of a people who inhabited an ancient state in Sumatra known to the Chinese in the mid-seventh century as ‘Mo-lo- yeou’ which was situated in Jambi on the southeastern coast of Sumatra. This ancient people spoke a relatively undeveloped language which was not Malay as we know it today, but which scholars refer to as ‘Old Malay’ which had no written form of its own.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xv.
[3] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 12.
[4] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 12
[5] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 13
[6] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 13.
[7] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 16
[8] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 26
[9] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 33.
[10] “This ancient people (Melayu) spoke a relatively undeveloped language which was not Malay as we know it today, but which scholars refer to as ‘Old Malay’ which had no written form of its own. The force that moved the genius of the Malay being to create their own new language by taking the best words from all the languages of the neighbourhood was the emergence of Islam from within that being. It was due to Islam also that the knowledge and use of this new Malay language, not only as a lingua franca for international trade and commerce, but more importantly as a literary and scientific language, spread to all parts of the Archipelago and gave this heterogeneous region not merely an outward aspect of unity, but more profoundly an inward unity of souls bound together in religion. In its written form, the new language is formulated and articulated in the Arabic script with five additional symbols to represent phonemes not found in Arabic. European scholars and historians have mistakenly called this script (i.e. Jawi) ‘Perso-Arabic’. I think the correct term to name the script is Malayo-Arabic. The cultural substratum of the Malay language in its spoken and written form is also Arabic and Islamic and not Sanskrit and Hindu-Buddhist. It was from the learned and scientific writings of Muslim and Malay thinkers and scholars of the 16th and 17th centuries that the modern Malay language is descended. The spread of the new and vibrant Malay language and literature as a vehicle of Islam and knowledge presently used by more than two hundred million people in the Malay Archipelago is one of the most important factors in the creation of nationhood, the other factor being the religion of Islam itself.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. Pp. xv–xvi.
[11] “Islamic civilization as a civilization that emerges among the diversity of cultures of Muslim peoples of the world as a result of the permeation of the basic elements of the religion of Islam which those peoples have caused to emerge from within themselves. The process by which such emergence comes about is called Islamization, which is the liberation first from magical, mythical, animistic and ethnic cultural tradition incompatible with Islam, and then from secular control over one’s reason and one’s language. Whatever basic and praiseworthy elements of the pre-Islamic civilization that bind people together and are accepted as compatible with Islam become part of Islamic civilization. It is a living civilization whose pulse describes a process of Islamization, not in the dialectical sense of an evolutionary ‘development’, but in the sense of a progress involving every generation of Muslims towards realization of the original nature and spirit of Islam as something already established in history; in the sense of an unfolding of the theoretical and practical principles of Islam in the life of the people; in the sense of an actualization of the essentials and potentials of Islam in the realms of existence. This progress, unfolding, and actualization depend upon the levels of knowledge of Islam, of intellectual and cultural attainment of the peoples in which the progress, unfolding and actualization occur. Islamic civilization is therefore a manifestation of unity in diversity as well as of diversity in unity. In terms of cultural history Malay civilization is an Islamic civilization.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xv.
[12] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Concluding Postscript to the Origin of the Malay Sha‘ir. P. 51
[13] “…its (Islam) emergence in the Malay Archipelago came about through propagation by authoritative missionaries, understandably slow at first at the end of the 7th century and increasing in momentum by the 12th to the 16th centuries continuing to the present day.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. xvii.
[14] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 22.
[15] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 19.
[16] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 20.
[17] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 63.
[18] “According to the Malay custom of succession, only when the king’s older son by his wife married and had a son, presenting the king with a grandson, would that son succeed him as king.” Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. 31.
[19] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Historical Fact and Fiction. P. 66.
[20] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 37.
[21] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 58.
[22] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 56–57
[23] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 39
[24] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Pp. 42–43
[25] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 65
[26] Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. The Origin of the Malay Sha‘ir. Kuala Lumpur: Ta’dib International. 2018. P. 1.
[27] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. P. 46.
[28] Syed Naquib Al-Attas. Islam Dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu. Pp. 46–47
Comparative Colonial Identities
Sources
Primary Sources
The following corpus of writings are selected based upon their relevance the theme of this study; the Malay colonial identity in the writings of Stamford Raffles (1781– 1826).
Letters
Letter from Stamford Raffles to John Leyde, dated 24 May 1806.
This letter was written in Penang Island. Raffles discusses the Malay Calendar.
Letter from Stamford Raffles to Philip Dundas, dated 6 July 1806.
This letter discusses the influence of India towards the Malay language, literature, and popular narratives.
Letter from Stamford Raffles to Lord Minto, dated 4 May 1811.
Letter from Stamford Raffles to Colonel Young, dated 12 February 1819.
This letter discusses the success of the mission in obtaining a British Station in the Eastern Isles which is Singapore.
Letter from Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) to J. Adam, Dated 13 February 1819.
“The Sultan of Johor and the Temenggung of Singapore, are competent to the conclusion of a treaty and the transfer to the British of ground sufficient for our Factories…”
M2: Singapore: Letters from Bengal to the Resident Page 177 of 407, 26 June 1819
In this document, it is stated that without the consent of Sultan Husein of Johor, the Temenggung of Johor and Farquhar, no farm or anything could be built in Singapore, and signed by the Sultan of Johor, Temenggung of Johor, Lord Furqahar, and Stamford Raffles.
Letter from Stamford Raffles to Reverend Tho’ Raffles, dated 15th November 1823.
This letter writes of the Padries, a Muslim sect in Sumatera who call themselves Putih or white in opposing to others, hitam or black, who do not follow their doctrine.
M2: Singapore: Letters from Bengal to the Resident Page 11 of 407
Treaty of Friendship and Alliance concluded between the Honourable Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles Lieutenant Governor of Fort Marlborough and its Dependencies Agent of the most Noble Francis Marquis of Hastings Governor General of India for the Honourable East India Company on the one Part and their Highnesses Sultan Mohamed Shah Sultan of Johore and Dato Tumongong Sri Maharajah Abdol [Rahman] Chief of Singapore and its Dependencies on the other Part.
Reports
Minute on the Singapore Institution
This minute is regarding the Singapore Institution and the inhabitants of Singapore.
Books
On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions.
Stamford Raffles. On the Malayu Nation, with a Translation of Its Maritime Institutions. Asiatic Researchers: Comprising History and Antiques, the Arts, Sciences and Literature of Asia. Vol 12. New Delhi: Cosmo Publication. 1816.
Statement of the Services of Sir Stamford Raffles
The purpose of this statement was to secure financial stability to his family in the event of his death. In this document, Raffles entails his services to the East India Company in a chronological order.
Book Chapter
Introduction to Sejarah Melayu translated by John Leyden.
He gives a concise description of John Leyden and writes some characteristics of the Malay people in the Introduction. Stamford Raffles. Introduction. Sejarah Melayu. Translated by John Leyden. Kuala Lumpur: Silverfish. 2019. Originally published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown in 1812.
Secondary Sources
Carl A. Trocki has discovered that Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) calls the Malay Rajas specifically Temenggung Abdul Rahman (r. 1806–1825) pirates, it was because they had a trading network before Raffles’ presence in Southeast Asia and the Temenggung Abdul Rahman (r. 1806–1825) could command the Malays on the land and people of the sea, a feat that the native rulers could do prior to colonialism, while Raffles did not have this maritime ability.
In Carl A. Trocki’s Prince of Pirates: the Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore 1784–1885, in the context of British colonial discourse, the Malay and Bugis chiefs who managed the native trading network in the southern Malay States, particularly in Riau, were frequently labeled as “pirates” by British colonial officials such as Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) and John Crawfurd (1783– 1868).
This characterization was part of a broader strategy by colonial authorities to delegitimize Malay authority and control over the region’s maritime trade. The term “pirate” was strategically employed to undermine the political and economic autonomy of these leaders, framing their activities as lawless and disorderly rather than as legitimate forms of native governance. This label was particularly convenient for the British, as it helped to justify their interventions in the region, positioning the colonial state as a civilizing force and a necessary counter to perceived anarchy.
Similarly, Temenggung Abdul Rahman (r. 1806–1825) of Johor, a key figure in the region’s politics, was also branded a pirate by colonial authorities due to his reliance on naval power and his attempts to consolidate authority through alliances with the “sea people” or maritime communities. This approach to power, heavily centered on naval and maritime networks, was an integral part of the socio-political landscape in the Malay States prior to colonial dominance.
However, with the imposition of colonial structures, such maritime-based power dynamics were often viewed as a challenge to European imperial control, and thus, figures like Temenggung Abdul Rahman (r. 1806–1825) were portrayed in a negative light by colonial officials. The use of the “pirate” label is indicative of the broader colonial tendency to discredit indigenous leadership and political structures. It is important to note that the Malay and Bugis chiefs, as well as figures like Temenggung had developed sophisticated systems of governance and trade networks that were central to the region’s economy. However, under colonialism, such practices were often viewed through a Eurocentric and capitalistic lens that failed to appreciate the Malay understanding of sovereignty and trade. This marginalization and the associated label of “pirate” illustrate how colonial narratives were employed to reinforce colonial control by casting indigenous political and economic systems as chaotic or unlawful. Thus, the regression of many of these skills, particularly those associated with 30 maritime power, can be seen as a consequence of colonialism’s disruptive impact on pre-existing social and political structures in the Malay Archipelago.
p.s. The Malay and Bugis rajas who managed the Chinese junk trade, the settlements of Chinese labourers, the British trade in opium, guns and cloth, and the Bugis trading network for more than 50 years before Raffles (1781–1826) set foot on the Singapore Island was branded as pirates by Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) and John Crawfurd. Carl A. Trocki, The Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore 1784-1885. Second Edition (2007). Singapore: NUS Press. 2017. P. 6.
p.p.s. “In the 1830’s some Europeans considered the Temenggong Ibrahim to be associated with piracy in the waters around Singapore because he could control the sea and command the sea people; he was born in a time when Malay princes still sought power through control of the sea and the sea peoples, when his father died in 1825, he was still a young man, and needed to establish his authority as a man of power; however, the ability to conduct an orderly administration of territory through the use of written records in conjunction with skilled officials was also a part of his heritage; this aspect of his background made it possible for him and his descendants to succeed in an age where so many of their contemporaries were destroyed by the colonial advance. Ibid. P. 6.
Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljuneid. Raffles and Religion: This book has been translated to the Malay language as Melayu di Mata Raffles; Sebuah Kritik Kepada Orientalisme.
In Raffles and Religion: A Study of Sir Thomas Raffles’ Discourse on Religions Amongst Malays, the author explores Stamford Raffles’ (1781–1826) evolving perceptions of the Malays and their religious practices. Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) whose primary objective was to further the political and economic expansion of British interests in Southeast Asia, initially maintained a seemingly neutral stance towards Islam.
However, over time, his views shifted towards a more critical position. Stamford Raffles’ came to characterize the Malays as a “rude, uncivilized, and degraded” race, attributing their decline to the influence of Islam. This perspective, as the study argues, reveals Stamford Raffles’ personal assumptions and biases, which were shaped by colonial ideologies rather than an objective assessment of the Malay society. His discourse on Islam and the Malays reflects a broader pattern of colonial thought, in which indigenous cultures and religions were often seen as impediments to progress and civilization.
Stamford Raffles (1781–1826) demonstrates clear bias and prejudice in his writings concerning the Malays, revealing a lack of objectivity in his depiction of the native population. Stamford Raffles, who saw Britain as the epitome of civilization, held the belief that it was the British mission to “civilize” the world. His writings reflect this Eurocentric view, which positioned British colonialism as both a moral and cultural imperative. Importantly, Stamford Raffles was not a trained scholar, but rather a colonial administrator with strong communal and imperial interests that influenced his perceptions. His views were shaped by the prevailing racial and cultural hierarchies of the time, and his primary motivations were aligned with furthering English imperial expansion. As such, Stamford Raffles’ work cannot be seen as neutral or humanitarian; it is driven by the interests of colonial power rather than any genuine desire for reform or understanding of Malay society.
John Bastin. Raffles and Hastings: Private Exchanges behind the Founding of Singapore. Singapore: National Library of Singapore. 2014.

Read the thesis
If you want to understand why the labels matter, the thesis is where the argument begins.
- Understand the question behind Dangerous Labels
- Follow the argument connecting colonial representation, historiography, and Malay identity.
- Discover the foundation from which the individual studies of Light, Raffles, Swettenham, and other colonial writers emerge